150
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

Very soon protesting the use of LLMs is like going to be like protesting the advent of the television. There is no stopping it. We should endeavour to ensure it is used ethically rather than becoming puritanical about its use.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago

Nope, fuck that, fuck genAI it is unethical by virtue of stealing to train and vastly draining resources to power slop garbage.

Television was a medium, communication. GenAI is not communicating shit, it's trash sold on a lie.

[-] [email protected] -5 points 13 hours ago

Television was a medium

Yeah. We called it that because it was neither rare, nor well done. Bad writing has always existed.

it's trash sold on a lie.

You sweet summer child... The French have an expression for this: Plus ça change

[-] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

It will take a fundamentally different algorithmic approach to make further progress in ML.

We have never figured out a different approach since it's inception in the 60s

[-] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

There's still plenty of people who don't watch TV.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

From the article:

Danilov posited that the mistake was either the work of a "careless translator taking shortcuts", or it was "done by someone on the dev/publisher side who couldn't be arsed sending last-minute missing lines for translation and decided to throw them in a random LLM without oversight".

Handong Ryu, who handled the Korean translation for the game, replied: "I was responsible for translating the vast majority of the Korean version of The Alters. Unfortunately, the same issue exists in the Korean version as well, which makes it more likely that the second scenario you mentioned is closer to the truth.

Sounds like this text was either added late in development or simply overlooked until after the last set of translation work had been completed, so the devs decided to let an LLM do it rather than getting billed for another batch of localisation.

Very dumb, especially as this puts them in direct violation of the Steam AI disclosure policy, but given the context I guess they figured no one would notice.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

They could have used Google translate for these short last minute additions, and not a single fuck would probably notice. I hate this stupid overconfidence in AI.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Google Translate also uses an AI model.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

I have done translations and even for my own language I often use an LLM. It's the one thing they are actually amazing at. It's also probably not about "anybody noticing". It can very much be a single developer doing it on their own ChatGPT account and the QA didn't notice it.

I really don't care about this stuff though. The AI label should be for gen AI and not revising some text or translation imo.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

The issue becomes: if they used Gen AI to create background filler text, can we be 100% certain it wasn’t used elsewhere in the production of the game?

If they really wanted background text, they should have paid someone to write some, or use Lorem Ipsum if they didn’t want to spend the money and no one would have cared.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago

"like it or not, gen AI is becoming an invaluable tool for developers"..

..who wish to take a dump on their work.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

It will be used as a tool in pre-production and early stages of asset creation and no one will notice afterwards.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

You're expecting it to be used responsibly when we ourselves in general are very lacking in that department.

This here is a very good example of the actual use that will happen. A rush job to meet unrealistic deadlines. And that's what will happen as is the norm.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

We don‘t know the cause in this case. Not replacing placeholder assets was a common mistake even before ai tools.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago

That's kinda the problem. We're already careless with the things we do ourselves. It can't be helped, nobody's perfect. But once we start delegating tasks, we lose the direct experience. Priorities shift, attention moves to something else and the chance of carelessness rises because it's no longer a problem we have to concern ourselves with.

Meanwhile, the LLM "learns". What it "learns", nobody knows because it does so mechanically. There's zero understanding.
It keeps "learning" every time it's fed something, so you don't have a static program that does what it's told. Instead it's a "living" program that applies what it "learns". And that makes it unpredictable in the long run.

This turns the user into a glorified middle manager who has to hover over their employee and make sure they did their job as they should have. And how many middle managers do you know with that kind of dedication, that isn't spiteful at its core?

The push against this is that the people depending on it to do the work become less dependable themselves. And unless you're an independent developer without a profit driven publisher breathing down your neck, this will be used in all the wrong ways as a standard instead of it being the exception.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

I don’t think it’s important where the placeholder assets come from, or that mistakes will be more common when someone used gen AI instead of non-licensed stock image from a web search.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

You're right. It's an opinion and only as important as the one having the opinion decides it to be.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

According to the article as cited in this comment, we do know the reason and a rush job to meet a deadline is precisely why.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 20 hours ago

I wouldn’t say „precisely“ as those are (plausible) speculations.

load more comments (44 replies)
[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

"You're not actually supposed to read that text so this is not an issue." Good job missing the point.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

That's kinda sloppy, mainly in the disclosure and translation department, but nothing that some updates won't solve.

I'm happy to support these devs with original ideas, even while they use some AI in a non-intrusive way. They have done something more important for in my book, which is following regional pricing.

It's stupid how several studios think charging my 3rd world country the same or even more than the US is a good idea. CDPR and bethesda think it's ok, but It's disgusting. I would rather support 11bit.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
150 points (98.7% liked)

Games

20030 readers
549 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS