this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
931 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59038 readers
3148 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 420 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Corporations: hey guys, let's unionize so the government doesn't exploit us.

Employees: hey, can we als...

Corporations: NO.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Collective action for we, not for thee.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 230 points 1 year ago (7 children)

every pirate related theme song getting increasingly louder in the background

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just bought 16 TB to expand my media server :)

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago

You must have a lot of Linux ISO backups. Doing your part to preserve open source software history.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have a feeling part of their plan is to sink all the pirate ships.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 215 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just call it what it is: bribing power

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure it's more or less a cartel at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 142 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

streamers are currently being forced to reckon with their profitability — or lack thereof.

Netflix's 2023 2nd quarter revenue: 8.1 billion dollars BTW

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (25 children)

Brace yourself for a tidal wave of corporate apologists rushing to point out that “revenue isn’t profit!,!”

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The number you're looking for is $1.49 billion in net income for Q2 2023.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

See? Clearly not profitable, need more ads

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

What's that? You want to share your four-screens-at-a-time account with three other people outside your house?

Fuck you, pay us more.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Profit is the portion of revenue that is stolen from workers and given to shareholders. Profit is bad. Revenue is good.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless you use that revenue to do stock buybacks, then it’s not considered profit but you still get to steal it from the workers. That way you can cry about unprofitability while all your shareholders and c suites crank up the exploitation of workers and consumers chasing “profitability” until the business collapses.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

On a tangent, and nothing to do with you, but I don't like how these streaming companies are being called "streamers". Streamers are those people streaming on twitch, not a company like Netflix damnit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 117 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The slow march back to cable is unstoppable.

Pirate everything. Share everything.

Piracy is an access problem, not a consumer problem.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

dismantle capitalism. I bet in like 24 years some disruptor is going to come along and buy up rights to the shit thats on peacock Hulu etc now and offer 9 bucks a month to stream it to you. rinse repeat. fuck this corpo nightmare.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 116 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Welcome back to the high seas mateys!

🏴‍☠️

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I’ve learned anything about corporate lobbying groups it’s that they only exist to fuck you and ruin any legislation that attempts to protect you from them.

Eat shit SIA.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Corps form "unions" and use money gained by preferential treatment by government to create propaganda shitting on unions.

Funny that.

No wait, infuriating. That's the word.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Get rid of them. Socialize their service. Host all content at media.gov and take costs out of taxes. We could pay artists more, have 0 ads, all for like $15 per paycheck. Those taxes would fund grants for artists and cover platform costs. No ads. No corporations.

P.S. you already pay taxes on media through various 3 letter institutions and licensing. It's not different from what we have other than eliminating the things we all dont like.

Watch the video. Benn Jordan has done a lot of the heavy lifting for us. This lobby exists to stop that from ever happening and nothing more. Fight them to the death.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Could they, instead, band together to offer a service that’s more user friendly than piracy? I suppose bribery is cheaper and easier.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

They did, it was called Netflix.

Then the Netflix rates went up while everyone pulled and splintered content onto their own services and then started shuffling it around.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Lobbying should be fucking banned.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

It is far more likely that remarks against lobbying will be banned, because someone would lobby for that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The streaming market is splintered to max and oversaturated by content. The bubble already burst and now people are cordcutting again or fleeing to independent content. Absolutely nobody wants ads back and all companies do is push them on users for ever more revenue. The model only worked because it wasn't as inconvenient and full of ads as traditional paytv/cable.

So now we've gone full circle and back to lobbies who at some point will undoubtedly create streaming-packages that will include a certain set of partenered services. Can't wait for the +1000€ per year -T-mobile-package-plan! Apart from Spotify who have kept their "affordable music streaming for 9.99€" promise over the last 10 years....the motion picture models have just become more expensive and user-unfriendly!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Streaming has ultimately taught me how little I 'need' to watch since it trains you to really only seek out a couple things per service. I've also become very advertisment sensitive being blessed with tools to avoid that and companies honeymooning people for a while with fewer ads compared to what cable did.

Obviously, the dipshits are springing their 'trap' but I'm not bullish on the strategy of forcing consumers to suddenly tolerate a return of ads everywhere and always on entertainment. I just see folks running away again/further disconnecting from traditional media.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup. The high seas are looking more attractive every day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Guillotine sales soar as citizens band together for lobbying power"

One can dream

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do what you want 'cause a pirate is free.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Laws like the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA), which features overly broad definitions of the platforms it targets and has troubling privacy implications thanks to surveillance requirements, could sweep companies like Netflix or Disney up into its dragnet.

Streaming companies are usually pro-net neutrality, and that’s been a difficult concept for lawmakers and regulators in DC to fully grasp.

For those that read just the headline. Not everything is black and white.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

Every now and again, their interests align with the average person.

But make no mistake, the companies forming a coalition like this for one or two good causes won't make up for the long term damage it will no doubt cause.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It felt inevitable at some point this was going to happen after they got caught off guard by the strikes to make sure that it never happens again, but the fight is not over yet.

It's more important than ever then for you guys to support the WGA and SAG-AFTRA strike, fight for workers, and fight for unions.

Otherwise, they'll just keep squeezing and squeezing, until there is nothing left.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hello https://jellyfin.org, transmission, radarr and sickbeard

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think this is why net neutrality is so important. Back in the days the electromagnetic spectrum was not as heavily regulated as it is now. Technically anyone with the technical know how could set up a broadcasting station. Then CBS, ABC, NBC all got together and did exactly what these companies are doing. They banded together to make it harder for the average person to get access to technology. This is their primariy goal. To give their companies priority at the network level (seconds matter) and also, most likely what they want is to 1. Find ways for their content to be regulated differently and be sold as network packages 2. Probably allow their content to be delivered through means that require people pay THEIR ISPs. Now, i will be honest. I have not read the article but i knlw this has been the intended goal for many years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's cool, I've kicked them all to the curb over the past two years.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine missing the point so completely. Streaming, what a joke now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

Checkout streamio

You'll definitely stop paying these streaming giants.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's almost never a pricing issue, but a service issue. They can band together in their bullshit campaign all they want. They're still not getting my money, because I'm not paying 15 a month, to watch one movie with 7 ads, after which they'll also sell my data

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Netflix and others look for power in number$.

Welcome to the United $tate$ of America, people; Where money is the only thing that matters

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

Incoming attempts to legislate recordless VPN bans and over the top piracy mitigation strategies instead of attempting to provide better services to their users

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

That's called a cartel

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Yo ho ho and a bottle of rum

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

This can only be a bad thing.

They will win and like live nation, will merge with more well placed companies until they are printing their own money.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

You don't need a union, we are all family here.jpeg

load more comments
view more: next ›