Please be Advised for Help Farmers (lemmy.ca)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

To preface none of my fellow admins know about this post due to the language that I am using.
Although I do believe that they would be supportive of this as they care about our users just as much as I do.

I just had a run in with a user asking for help who then deleted their post and comments soon after.

If you see any users asking for help I would personally recommend a couple of things to look out for:

Check their profile;
- how old's the account?
- what kinds of posts and comments are they making?
  - Are they the kind of user you'd be cool with being friends with?
- Do they have history of deleting posts/comments? If so why? and how often?
Check the modlog;
- have they done or said anything that warrented themselves getting banned or their posts/comments removed?

I'm making this post as I'm personally frustrated seeing posts and comments being removed as it actively harms instances, communities, and most importantly users.

I absolutely despise when I go a saved post or comment thread that I wanted to reread later only to find that I can't cause the post/thread's been deleted by a single user.

There's so much useful or interesting and creative things that people care about and also want to share in terms of life experiences or just having a cool thing to collaborate and work on.

having this be ruined by individuals that want to 'dine and dash' basically ruins this.

Honestly Fuck you.
If you 'help farm' especially I will find you and I will ban you because you are actively harming users who spend their precious time, effort, and humanly love to do cool stuff here on the Fediverse.

all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I am less concerned with the long term traces we leave. Social interactions are ephemeral (or were, prior to moving them to the Internet) and we are here trying to meet our social needs, not necessarily to Build A Better World. I am all for the things we say naturally expiring and falling out of the record.

What bothers me is how a living conversation can be killed. And in such a way as to make it difficult even to find the people you were just interacting with again, if you don't happen to remember their account ID.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

What upset me the most about this wasn't that it happened to me but the fact that I saw that this was a repeated bahavior and I can imagine just how annoying and infuriating it feels to be on the recieving end of it for several other users.

I can deal with it as I've got backup methods from experience so for me it's annoying but eh whatever. I'm just annoyed because I know that others have had to experience this zero-sum behavior as well.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

I get the feeling. An adjacent behaviour I've seen is someone making a few aggressive comments on one account, getting them removed and a ban, then deleting that account and creating an alt so that their reputation is now "clean" again.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah that's another good one to point out.👍

I find those users entertaining when I see them cause their poor behavior is what got them banned in the first place; a new account's gonna do jack shit to improve that

You reminded me I should also add a "check the account's age"🙌🌻

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's a blunt instrument, but I've been temp-banning any new account that posts to any of the various "ask" communities. When I check back on them a few days later, 99% of them show up as "ERROR" when I view them on their home instance.

The upside is that with them being banned at the time they nuke their accounts, the delete request is not accepted and the content/replies remain available.

I'm to the point I'm considering patching the server to ignore federated account deletions since they're being abused by a small number of people in a way that affects the majority of users.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

The questions belong to the users, there is no contention about that.

However the answers belong to those who offered them, making the entire conversation belong to the community as a whole.

Unfortunately I seriously doubt that Lemmy will ever change its behavior in this regard. Keeping a post up after deletion smacks too much of Reddit behavior, and Lemmy defines itself in Reddit's shadow. :-(

Fortunately PieFed has no such limitation, so asking for a feature to help deal with this issue seems to have a very good chance of working on it. :-)

[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

It's true that just keeping a 'deleted' placeholder with all the comments would already be an improvement

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

iirc, deleted comments remain in the profile of the user that wrote them. So a lot of the value lies not in "having those answers", but in placing those answers side-by-side along with the question. Which allows things like someone having the same question searching for it by keyword, and then finding the answers that they seek underneath that heading. For such to work then, we would need the actual text (& title) of the question.

But then that wraps back around to who owns the question... and shouldn't the owner be allowed to delete it, or edit it however they wish? Which makes me think: there is no system that will work in the face of malicious or at least inattentive bad actors. Perhaps social media is just a bad place to have such a question-and-answer forum, in favor of things such as wikipedia or more specialized forums (StackOverflow comes to mind).

I liked Admiral Patrick's take on it: ultimately we cannot control others, only ourselves, so he prevents brand-new accounts from being able to make posts in those communities in the first place, knowing that there is such a high likelihood that they are an attention vampire that will leave hurt feelings of frustration (and sometimes even betrayal) in the wake of their passing. But he only controls one instance, so at best it is only a test of what might work at a larger scale.

I do note that afaik PieFed's moderation abilities could automate that though (at least it should be able to? admittedly I have not tested this first-hand, only read about it long ago): e.g. it could prevent anyone with an account less than a certain age from making posts, as he does. It is one solution at least, hopefully we can dream up others as well! :-)

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

I liked Admiral Patrick’s take on it: ultimately we cannot control others, only ourselves, so he prevents brand-new accounts from being able to make posts in those communities in the first place, knowing that there is such a high likelihood that they are an attention vampire that will leave hurt feelings of frustration (and sometimes even betrayal) in the wake of their passing. But he only controls one instance, so at best it is only a test of what might work at a larger scale.

That could work on support communities, but we don't want to give potential new joiners too much of a waiting time before they can post or comment, this would increase the likelihood of them leaving.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Right - definitely a problematic solution, needing to balance both the needs of the new users as well as the community overall. Perhaps a first-time poster could have a pop-up displayed with a message such as "You don't intend to ask a question, take up people's time to answer it, and then delete it once you've met your selfish need... do you?" :-P

Perhaps another factor is how considerate people would not dream of doing so in the first place. But we are separating here the value of the user vs. the discussion that would subsequently be taking place. Admiral Patrick’s idea distinguishes between different classes of users: those most likely to contribute substantively to the Threadiverse, vs. those who are far less likely to. But it isn't the user per se that is the issue, and rather only that particular category of action (deletion after having their singular question answered, probably by a lurker or even non-Threadizen that came here specifically for purposes of getting their needs met, then they bounce) that is the problem. However, Lemmy is extremely limited in its ability or even willingness to provide a solution for the latter (the action being the problem), hence his need to do such "out of the box" thinking and approach the problem from the perspective of the former (distinguishing those users being most likely to cause the problem). PieFed seems to offer a platform to deliver a real solution to the actual problem itself... like my aforementioned idea of a pop-up box displayed to first-time posters, although hopefully much better ideas can be thought up than that. :-D

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I think it's the only fair compromise. I think we should respect a right to delete. But I don't think that right to delete should be powerful enough to smother discussion. The person who started the communal thread should not have the power to silence everyone who participates.

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025

22 points (92.3% liked)

Lemmy.ca's Main Community

3547 readers

15 users here now

Welcome to the lemmy.ca/c/main community!

All new users on lemmy.ca are automatically subscribed to this community, so this is the place to read announcements, make suggestions, and chat about the goings-on of lemmy.ca.

For support requests specific to lemmy.ca, you can use [email protected].

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]