57
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Was there ever a nation to come from fascism without a war or a revolution?

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago
[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_transition_to_democracy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_transition_to_democracy

Americans just can't conceive of it for some reason. Always itching for a fight and not even contemplating the notion that the fight isn't immediately adjacent to doing nothing.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

You're so right and wise and morally correct, MudMan, we need to let them murder people for fifty years first.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Did I say that? At what point did I say that? Is the snarky straw man thing a coping mechanism? Because it certainly isn't an argument.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Sure, after killing 3000 chileans.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Do you count nonviolent revolutions?

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

Nonviolent revolution, like street protests and strikes etc. is just another word for plain and simple democratic change - so yes, absolutely.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

In that case, the nonviolent People Power Revolution ended 20 years of Ferdinand Marcos's dictatorship

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Not sure if this fits the description but Greece seems to have done it pretty well in 74

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metapolitefsi

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

But in November 17th of the previous year, a riot had occurred which ultimately resulted in the end of the military junda.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athens_Polytechnic_uprising

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Fair - I wouldn't call it a war though. Not even a revolution as such. It was a riot as you say, with a clash where 40 individuals estimated killed.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Look at the fall of Franco’s regime

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Jesus, that's depressing, considering how long Franco was in power.

Rump might live off McDs but he also doesn't drink and gets regular movement (can you call golf exercise?) Its very possible he could plague us for another ten years.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes. You need all the military on the side of the people.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

Nup

I wish I had better news for you

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Is the bad news you aren't very good at Wikipedia searches?

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Hands probably too sticky.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

What happened was definitely revolutionary

It wasn't as violent as some others, but it was still revolution

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

What happened where?

Since when are elections revolutions? If everything is a revolution nothing is. If you define a revolution as a change of regime then all changes of regime are revolutions, it's a useless, entirely tautological definition.

The OP is asking if fascist regimes have been reverted "without a war or a revolution", presumably meaning without violent conflict.

This is a thing. It has happened multiple times, no matter how low of a bar for violence you set in place.

this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
57 points (98.3% liked)

History

5504 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to History!

A community dedicated to sharing and discussing fascinating historical facts from all periods and regions.

Rules:

FOLLOW THE CODE OF CONDUCT

NOTE: Personal attacks and insults will not be tolerated. Stick to talking about the historical topic at hand in your comments. Insults and personal attacks will get you an immediate ban.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS