46
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The United States Supreme Court ruled on Thursday in favor of seven American gun manufacturers in a lawsuit brought by the Mexican government accusing them of aiding and abetting Mexican cartels.

Case file: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1141_lkgn.pdf

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago

Of course they did. Running guns into Mexico in order to arm the cartels and keep the country unstable is US oligarch policy, snd this SC's sole purpose is to serve the interests of the oligarchs.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

No they sided with them because the lawsuit is like suggesting that Toyota is providing trucks to ISIL. This lawsuit was dumb as fuck and had no chance.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

It claims nothing of the sort.

It claims that the sheer magnitude of the transfers means that the gun manufacturers have to have some awareness of which of their distributors are providing guns to the cartels, and that they've systemstically turned a blind eye to them.

Which is not only possible but likely.

But it runs up against the fact that the powers-that-be in the US have a vested interest in the cartels getting as many guns as possible, being as violent as possible, and undermining Mexican stability as much as possible, in order to maintain US hegemony in North America.

Thus the Supreme Court's ruling, because at this point in our history, they don't work for the benefit of the people - they work for the benefit of the wealthy and empoweredl few.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The cartels get the majority of their firearms from straw purchases. No one who buys straw purchased firearms shops at the same dealers in mass quantities.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

You mean to tell me that the US government sided with the unethical businesses? Whaaaat /s

[-] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They didn't side with anyone. They interpreted the law that says gun manufacturers cannot be sued*, to mean that gun manufacturers cannot be sued.

*Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA)

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Not true. They did side with the American gun manufacturers by declaring supplying cartels is a lawful commerce of arms. As a result of that declaration the lawsuit was dismissed under the act.

this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

Legal News

585 readers
19 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS