363
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Starlink satellite connections in the White House bypass controls meant to stop leaks and hacking.

Elon Musk’s team at the U.S. DOGE Service and allies in the Trump administration ignored White House communications experts worried about potential security breaches when DOGE personnel installed Musk’s Starlink internet service in the complex this year, three people familiar with the matter told The Washington Post.

The people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive issues, said those who were managing White House communications systems were not informed in advance when DOGE representatives went to the roof of the adjacent Eisenhower Executive Office Building in February to install a terminal connecting users in the complex to Starlink satellites, which are owned by Musk’s private SpaceX rocket company.

The people said those managing the systems weren’t able to monitor such connections to stop sensitive information from leaving the complex or hackers from breaking in.

Non-paywall link

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 114 points 1 day ago

Why do people think they put in there in the first place? It's not like the fucking White House doesn't have internet access

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

So their communications bypass control that are meant to prevent hacking.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

No need to keep Moscow out, the data actually hops there three times on the way to the outside world.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Adding additional backup communication methods is a good thing. Your home might be fine with one connection, but large businesses often have 2 or more separate physical connections for redundancy. I'm sure places like the White House effectively have as many as they can. One of the worst things for the White House is to be disconnected from communication with the outside world.

This clearly wasn't intended for that purpose, but I'm sure that's at least partially how they sold it to get it done quickly get it installed now for DOGE use and it can be added to those systems later, additional ongoing revenue as well.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Do you think you’re the first person to come up with the concept of redundant internet connections to the fucking whitehouse? God Elon zombies are so unbelievably stupid.

[-] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago

So Musk being cast out means all of a sudden they care about security?

Perfectly demonstrating that the in/out group separation is the only principle they care about.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I clearly remember these concerns being reported when Musk got the antennas installed in the first place.

Now is the time to remind everyone involved about this very minor issue that was never addressed.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They care about the appearance and PR of security. Which is why any narrative that pushes blame away from whomever they want on to whomever they wish is always gonna be the plan.

Edit: Literally just hit post mid sentence 😟

[-] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I was about to write “no shit Sherlock” but you’ve essentially beat me to it!

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

What I get from that is that Musk is no longer giving Trump's people access to all the data the collection of which was the entire point all along.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

He's holding U.S. hostage from us.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

Sometimes Trump is very stupid

[-] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago

I disagree with the first word in your comment.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Other times, incredibly so.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

this isn't just some silly bs. these kids are playing games with you. Your life, your whole existence. if you ever worked a day, you are now fucked. they got you catalogued.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

it's weird to judge on the basis of thumbnails

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

i probably meant to get my self into trouble. but my mom wants to come chill.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

no escape if we don't laugh at the likes of Joni Ernst. i mean, explain it to me, menstruatiot.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

(It always was)

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Elmo and Pooters will know every time Orange Droolius drops one in his Depends®.

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
363 points (99.7% liked)

politics

24023 readers
3875 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS