19
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

The government would allow producers up to 15 per cent of recycling targets to be met by burning non-recyclable plastic waste in incinerators or cement kilns.

Ontario is still dumping billions of bottles and cans, while other provinces profit from a deposit-return recycling system. Despite 81 per cent of Ontarians supporting such a system, last year the Ford government scrapped the non-alcoholic drink container deposit-return program, citing cost concerns “for small businesses and families,” without providing any estimates.

Ontario NDP environment critic Peter Tabuns said the Ford government’s decision to delay recycling targets and loosen producer obligations is a clear example of corporate influence overriding public interest. He argued that big companies have had more than a decade to develop less wasteful packaging but failed to act. Tabuns said the idea behind extended producer responsibility was to force innovation by making polluters pay, but the changes signal a retreat from that principle. He added that the government’s decision to allow incineration to count toward recycling targets would worsen climate emissions and increase toxic pollution.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Despite 81 per cent of Ontarians supporting such a system, last year the Ford government scrapped the non-alcoholic drink container deposit-return program, citing cost concerns “for small businesses and families,” without providing any estimates.

Wait, what?! Does that mean I no longer get a refund for cans & bottles by taking them back?

IMO the system had a problem where they didn't increase the deposit to be in line with inflation. We were still getting 1990s return rates, so it simply stopped being worth while for most people.

In a certain light, I do actually see a leftist case for removing the deposit: the poorer you are, the more incentive you have to bring back empties. Thus it can be viewed in the lens of any other fixed rate goods or service tax that disproportionately affects poor people.

Then again, are distributors just going to keep prices the same and enjoy not paying out for returns? Most likely.

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)

Ontario

2901 readers
5 users here now

A place to discuss all the news and events taking place in the province of Ontario, Canada.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS