top 35 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 29 points 3 years ago (3 children)

Has elon musk called anyone a pedo yet?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 years ago (20 children)

    No talk of passengers, so at the very least one person is missing, but up to 5. Also they have no other submersible that can reach that depth. From an insurance stance, that sounds like a massive liability risk to undertake, not to mention it’s just unwise.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (18 children)

    So, in the live feed the BBC has going, there's a post suggesting that a group of "explorers" were apparently on board based on one of them's Facebook feed, so it's safe to say they probably had the full passenger set on there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (14 children)

    Which means they gross $750,000 per 8 hour trip. They should have a recovery vessel at those prices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (13 children)

    One of the other posts in the feed makes it sound like they only do it a handful of times a year, and that cost is covering a multi-day excursion since they have to wait for conditions to be right. Still, no excuse to not have contingencies, but I think their take gets eaten into a fair bit more than the raw math would suggest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (11 children)

    I wager they don’t have a recovery vessel because they have people sign contracts only allowing arbitration.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    The CBS guy read aloud part of the thing he had to sign when he rode on it.

    And the video is horrifying on so many levels…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    I wouldn't be surprised. But, I suspect there's also a factor of just implausibility. Apparently, the main vessel they use is "experimental", so it may just literally be impossible to have a recovery vessel without being a literal government.

    My money's on this being the result of someone ignoring the "hey, these are not good conditions" warnings.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Not just 'experimental'. This thing looks like something you'd find on a backyard engineering website. Some of it's functionality is accessed with an offbrand video game controller.

    CBS interview featuring the submersible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago* (4 children)

    The bit with the contract is @ 2:40:

    An experimental submersible vessel that has not been approved or certified by any regulatory body and could result in physical injury, disability, emotional trauma or death.

    At least you can't say they didn't know what they were getting into. Still an awful way to go, if it did implode at depth, at least it'd be quick.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I think I’d rather implode and go instantly, than be floating on the surface for 4 days and unable to get out while slowly suffocating.

    Neither is my idea of a good time…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Can they not open a hatch if it's on the surface?

    Water would be a problem still, but not suffocation, if so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago

    Nope. The hatch is bolted from the outside. They can’t do anything from the inside and are utterly dependent on someone outside with a power socket wrench to unscrew each of the 17 bolts holding the hatch on.

    There are some design flaws with this thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago*

    According to the CEO the whole business isn't even profitable. They spent over a million on gas alone. At least this jerryrigged contraption sinking is the most effective way for their company to stop shitting up the atmosphere over the whims of a few rich people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children)

    Those are some dead rich folks

    edit: you'd have to be suicidal to ride in this thing, look at this vid

    https://twitter.com/FnpMarieOH/status/1670931677013524487

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    In one article from last year, the reporter said he someone has mortgaged their house to go on the trip. It's not even rich folks. It's fucking idiots.

    Still a horrible death, being trapped in a can with no way out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Just listened a podcast about the deepest ever submarine rescue. It's pretty much all hands on deck worldwide when a submarine goes missing. Atleast then it was. There aren't many rescue vessels that can go that deep.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago
    [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    I need them to find the submersible for my own mental sake. The list of phobias that this is checking off is too much. Claustrophobia, thalassophobia, mazeophobia..

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    BBC's also got a live feed going for this.

    Apparently, the sub's supposed to have a suite of systems to more or less warn the pilot if things are looking dicey, so hopefully this is a communications problem and not something worse.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    We need c/nottheonion for stuff like this...

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›