I experimented with it a bit but I just can't take Blazor seriously with its huge bundle sizes and interpreted IL. With AOT you can skip the interpreter and compile directly to wasm, but then the bundle size grows even bigger. I have pretty much given up on Blazor and the fact that Microsoft isn't using it for any of their products should be a clear signal to stay far away.
You can trim the code to some extent but not more than that because of reflection (I really wish reflection could be turned off). But eventually, one could use shared assemblies and download would happen only once for most of the binaries
Anyone actually using Blazor? Always seemed like a didn't-even-show-up to me, but I'm not a front-ender.
Last three or four years, all of our UI were done in Blazor server. Some are in production for more than two years.
I am not saying that there are no tradeoffs, but if you are already familiar with the dot net environment and c#, writing app in Blazor could be the right path, especially for backoffice apps.
I am just started fiddling with the latest version that automatically switch from server side to wasm without the user even noticing, and it is an awesome tech. There are still some tradeoffs, but they keep polishing the stack.
For context, I do write some react from time to time (outlooks addin) and razor pages, but I still prefer Blazor over these techs.
@TomasEkeli I help one of our customers to revamp a really old site with a new Blazor app. It's a big intranet site and the dev are C# devs and they know ASP.NET and desktop .NET apps.
The natural path was to stay on a .NET ecosystem for them. It's not a sexy site for consumers, they use SSO with Entra, they are running the app in Azure. We would have suggested to have another web UI tech stack but we didn't feel they could learn it fast enough vs. Blazor.
Cool tech, awful user experience. Got blacklisted where I work as an explicit don't use tech (despite being a Microsoft house)
I want it to work though, have a personal project that occasionally gets updated to see if they fixed things.
User experience as in developer or website visitor? Can you share a bit more about the significant issues making it a no-go?
Got blacklisted where I work as an explicit don’t use tech
Client-side Blazor, or server-side Blazor?
In it's entirety I think.
I considered it for https://dnstools.ws/, but it was very new and not mature enough when I was rebuilding the site back in 2020 or so. Only Blazor WebAssembly was available at the time; server-side / hybrid Blazor didn't exist yet. I ended up using React + SignalR for the frontend instead, and gRPC on the backend to communicate with the worker nodes.
Thank you for the tools! They've been useful to me a little while ago.
I'm using it at work. We have a customer portal running with it, and are working on a client-side PWA as well for a different use case / different set of users so that it can run offline.
🙋
Client side Blazor has a bright future. Server side, not so much.
I disagree. Server side blazor is really a great fit for internal apps at least. Then you have a combination of the two, where your app starts quickly in server side mode, once the wasm code is downloaded, it switches to client side mode.
Getting started
Useful resources
IDEs and code editors
Tools
Rules
Related communities
Wikipedia pages