this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
23 points (96.0% liked)

World News

32276 readers
501 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

12,500 ft underwater? Pass.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah this sounds like a bespoke Hell created just for me in case I am very, very evil in this lifetime. Inconceivable that people would pay actual money to experience this. :(

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A quarter million dollars to get in an Atlantan fleshlight.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

*Atlantean but kek

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

True Anon taught me to never, ever get into small passenger aircraft. Guess a new vehicle get added to that li-

Tour firm OceanGate, which runs $250,000-a-seat expeditions to the wreck

Yeah ok, never in my lifetime would I even het a chance lmao

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is only one billionaire aboard, seem like a waste of space.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There are ~~2640~~ 2639 billionaires in the world. It may not be much when you think about it, but it's a great start!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would be nice as journalist to be insistent on inquiring the duration of the dive so far.

They write it's missing, but it is obvious where it is.

They write contact was lost, but it is unknown when. This seems to be the whole point of such a news. Was contact lost 4 hours ago or 4 days ago? Contact lost 4h ago would probably be all fine, as they mention the dive tour takes around 8 hours. 4 days ago would mean they are all dead, as oxygen lasts that long according to the article.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also the link someone else posted says it has life support for 96 hours

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And it left on Sunday around 6am to start the 96 hr timer. Best case they lost power, dropped their load, and floated to the surface and are just bobbing around somewhere in the ocean.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a nightmare scenario. What about plumbing and water for 96 hours? How scary. Poor passengers!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They have a toilet behind a curtain. Imagine trying to hold poop for 3+ days.. Imagine being the first one that poops and the odour.... My eyes are stinging thinking about it...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How does one even plan for contingencies? 96-hour life support, but can specialized rescue subs get there in time?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like a proper contingency in this scenario would be some sort of "instant death" system. Knowing you're going to die, but waiting 96 hours for it to happen sounds terrible.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I get where you're coming from but this sounds like an insanely bad idea. Perhaps I'd agree with you if there was something like cyanide pills people could opt to take, but even then I'm hesitant. There should be no way for one person (or some subset of people) to decide for everyone that now is the time to die; if someone wants to be in their head and push the limit and die at the last minute, that's their call and theirs alone. Also, if there is some miraculous rescue but someone has pulled the "instant death" switch, they've effectively murdered the rest of the people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been toying around with some design concepts for a DIY submarine for like a decade now. The first thing I thought about, right after "how do I control it going up/down" was "what do I do when that system fails, and I need to ascend in an emergency?" My thought was to have some scuba tanks attached to deployable salvage lift bags, so even if my ballasts were completely screwed, I could still ascend.

If there's not something analogous to that on board the Titan, I'd be shocked at their stupidity; It seems incredibly foolhardy to intentionally go somewhere that no rescue vehicle can recover you, without secondary and tertiary systems in place to rescue yourself.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this concept is indeed unnecessary if you can't even open your submarine yourself in the first place, another article says the bolts outside need to be oppened by a crew on the support ship

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It could be mounted externally, separate from other systems, and it would be fairly trivial to implement a strictly mechanical means of activating it from inside the vessel. All that would be needed is to open the valve on the external pressure vessel.

If you're referring to getting out once you're on the surface...hell of a lot easier for rescue crews to find you and do that if you've got a huge orange inflatable holding you at the surface, rather than however many thousands of feet underwater.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

True. But I meant if all is only controlled from the inside, then what do you do if again that fails, seems like the same problem

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They may as well be on the moon.

Curious if they are connected via a tether of some type.

Either way, that’s not good and really sad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

OceanGate - with that name, I think they were onto something...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Tour firm OceanGate, which runs $250,000-a-seat expeditions to the wreck,

fucking mind-boggling

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The price includes the chance to become part of the attraction for future tourists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I could live for years off of that. Holy craps

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Heheheh. Rich ghouls.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I can think of a lot of things I would rather spend $250,000 on. I guess it's worth it to some!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe they should look under water instead of under way...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are we calling this? OceanGate-gate?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Titanic 2: Revenge of the Ship

load more comments
view more: next ›