A Black Texas high school student who was suspended because his loc hairstyle violated the district’s dress code was suspended again upon his return to school Monday, an attorney for the family told CNN.

Darryl George has been suspended for more than two weeks because his loc hairstyle violates the Barbers Hill Independent School District dress and grooming code, according to his family.

The code states that “male students’ hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes,” CNN previously reported.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 251 points 3 years ago (21 children)

The code states that "male students' hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes" CNN previously reported.

Is this school stuck in 1959?

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 3 years ago (8 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 200 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    ... Darryl was suspended the same week the state’s CROWN Act, a law prohibiting discrimination based on one’s hair texture or protective hairstyle such as locs and braids, went into effect.

    This is what systemic racism looks like in real life.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 163 points 3 years ago (22 children)

    The code states that “male students’ hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes,” CNN previously reported.

    Why do male and female students have different dress codes? WTF does the school system care if boys have longer hair? Apart from safety issues like being in a workshop class, why does anyone in the school system think they have the right to control who can and can't have certain hair lengths?

    Yo, is anyone else getting really sick of this overreach of power and authority? I'm not referring to the economic and political relations. Those aside, I'm talking about this crap where people are starting to get involved in personal matters of appearance, medicine, gender, and even straight bs crap like a high school band finishing a song. This is getting way out of hand. Our culture is rotting with power and control issues at the expense of individual liberties.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 3 years ago* (16 children)

    I’m talking about this crap where people are starting to get involved in personal matters of appearance

    I'm sorry to inform you, it used to be worse. Women rape victims used to not come forward because one of the main things that would be shoved in their faces was "how they dressed" and "were they asking for it."

    That bullshit has been a throughline in US culture for fucking decades. I'm in my forties and when I was in high school, girls had ridiculous dress codes that were clearly sexist and clearly icky as fuck. Why would male authority figures be so obsessed with young women not being "too revealing" unless they're the creepy fucks who are staring?

    Not to mention all the rules about men's pants sagging in the 90's. A rule that seemed aimed at young black and latino men in particular.

    Believe it or not, it's better than it was in the 90's. It's still bad, it's still bullshit, but it's not new.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I'm sorry to inform you, it used to be worse. Women rape victims used to not come forward because one of the main things that would be shoved in their faces was "how they dressed" and "were they asking for it."

    It still happens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (14 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 149 points 3 years ago* (7 children)

    This particular School District has pulled this stunt so many times that the State of Texas passed a damn law, called the CROWN Act, to make them stop! They're back it claiming that the CROWN Act doesn't regulate length or color.

    The CROWN Act sailed through the Texas Legislature with strong bi-partisan support and Gov Abbott even held a formal signing ceremony for it. How god damned racist do you have to be that even those people think you've gone too far?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 82 points 3 years ago

    Well it is considered poor form to just put 'NO BLACKS' in the prospectus.

    They had to get creative.

  • source
  • [–] 66 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Dress codes are like THE tool schools use to punish students that they dont like. eg. minorities, girls, anyone that doesnt conform to gender norms i.e trans kids etc. They cant get away with coming out and saying "whites only" so they selectively enforce the rules to target anyone they want.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 years ago

    I got suspended once for wearing a shirt with an anatomical drawing of a human skull on it. Like annotated and shit. I got sent to the principal multiple times for wearing simple eyeliner. They would literally force us to shave our faces with shitty disposable razors in a school bathroom if we had stubble. I've been able to grow a full beard since freshman year. I was more of a distraction covered in little cuts and nicks that my fucking stubble ever was. And this was over 11 years ago. I'm sure shit has only gotten worse in the little country towns in Texas. I have zero respect for any authorities figures. The only thing this kinda bullshit teaches you is to hate those with a modicum of power and to wish for the collapse of society.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 62 points 3 years ago (12 children)

    I said this in another thread, but this may be unconstitutional based on Bostock v. Clayton County. That was about employment though. You can’t discriminate based on sex. In the case it’s about discriminating against a gay person because “being attracted to women” is allowed for men but not women. So a hairstyle should not be allowed for women and not men. They are discriminating based on sex.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 years ago

    Children & students historically don't get the benefit of precedent or rights afforded to adults, unfortunately. Hope to see a different outcome here.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 60 points 3 years ago*
    [–] 50 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Ladies and gentlemen and everyone else:

    The land of the free

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 45 points 3 years ago

    Am I the only one seeing this kid’s picture and thinking he’s the least offensive teenager I’ve seen this week?

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 3 years ago* (23 children)

    Dress code standards for hair and appearance are pretty dumb... but even as they are written in this school district, I don't understand how this kid's hair violates it.

    The code says the hair can't extend below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes...and this kid's hair is above his eyebrows and above his ear lobes. I'm looking at the student's front, side, and back photos that are attached to the linked news article. What is the problem?

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 3 years ago

    The "problem" is hes black and the school wanted to punish him for that. But they dont want to just come out and say it just like they didnt want to show their faces back in the days of the klan.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 3 years ago (17 children)

    The actual dress code written in the article is:

    Male students’ hair must not extend below the top of a t-shirt collar or be gathered or worn in a style that would allow the hair to extend below the top of a t-shirt collar, below the eyebrows, or below the ear lobes when let down.

    It’s basically “no long hair, regardless of how it is styled.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Not quite. He is not really wearing a style that would allow the hair to extend below the collar, brows, or lobes because he can't just take out his hair style. Its not a pony tail to be removed and distract all the boys like in the movies, its been documented to be in place for at least 8 days. And even if he did his hair could stick straight out or stright up. Seems like the dress code was written for white people hair and instead of using any sort of common sense to not enforce or even just change the code the school is doubling down on murky rules in the national eye. If it walks like a racist, talks like a racist, and deprives black people of an education because of their hair its probably a racist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 41 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Poor kid. 2 weeks of his schooling disrupted over complete bs. Dress code is already mostly bs, but leave it to Texas to take it the nth degree and dictate hair length. Not even in Utah do they have such draconian rules on hair length.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 37 points 3 years ago

    That's probably the only time I've seen the word "loc" outside of Don't Be A Menace.

    Don't really think the school has a leg to stand on here. It's a neat and tidy haircut. It's not something I'd get done, but that's mostly because I'm a mid-40's balding white man.

    Suspending someone for having a black haircut is asking for trouble. Even in Texas.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I just wanna say I think this hairstyle is beautiful!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 28 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Is it a new thing to call dreads a "loc hairstyle" or something? I've never heard anything but 'dreads' or 'dreadlocks'.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 26 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

    Is he going to some kind of military school?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 24 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    It's because he's black and the faculty are fucking with him.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    The code states that “male students’ hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes,” CNN previously reported.

    I'm confused how does this not conform to those guidelines?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago

    “Male students’ hair must not extend below the top of a t-shirt collar or be gathered or worn in a style that would allow the hair to extend below the top of a t-shirt collar, below the eyebrows, or below the ear lobes when let down.”

    Ah, I see now... still they can suck 87 dicks with a dress code like that. "You can't look how you want when not here either?". Fuck that.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 21 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    The code states that “male students’ hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes,”

    Does this mean you can't have hair on the back of your head too? /s

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 years ago

    Schools having no fucking clue what to do and suspending kids aside, that they made him sit on a stool for 8 hours is some barbaric shit. Like when teachers wake kids up if they're taking a nap in study hall.

    Education, knowledge, and learning are great. Fuck teachers, schools, and administrators. Also fuck these racist pieces of shit especially

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago

    The code states that “male students’ hair will not extend, at any time, below the eyebrows or below the ear lobes,” CNN previously reported.

    Furthermore, the code demands that none of the students will be listening to those heathen Beatles.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›