Ask A&W (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by to c/memes@lemmy.world
 

Edit: It will never cease to make me laugh that I get more genuinely serious discussion comments on my meme posts in /c/Memes than anywhere else. I'm not hating, I love it.

Edit 2: Chicago-Style deep dish pizza isn't pizza go fuck yourself

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 106 points 1 year ago* (52 children)

I disagree with the glasses part as counterargument. Pizzas are sold by diameter in places that offer large and small - some even do medium. I also believe it would be nicer to have wider burgers instead of taller

  • source
  • hideshow 52 child comments
  • [–] 91 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Counterpoint - pizzas are sold by diameter, but pretty much everyone I know underestimates how diameter corresponds to actual pizza size and think a 16" pizza is twice as big as an 8" pizza instead of four times as big, which it actually is. Meanwhile, a burger patty that is twice as big as another one is actually twice as tall, while one that is wider is only about ~41% wider. Vertical dimension is more intuitive for the overall mass difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (10 children)
  • [–] 60 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Until you start selling a 1/3 lb burger to outcompete the 1/4 lb burger, but people are "4 is more than 3!" so your marketing fails...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (37 children)

    Who would even eat the taller pizza? I'd find it disgusting. I'm not saying anything about the burger.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 37 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 1 year ago (34 children)

    You have just insulted everyone in Chicago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (30 children)

    I'll do it, Chicago has terrible taste in food. Deep dish is preposterous, Malort is an abomination, and despite how you feel about ketchup, relish should not look like the ooze that creates ninja turtles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 30 child comments
  • [+] [S] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Nah. If you put two plates in front of me and one had a regular burger on it and the other had a burger that was as wide as the plate itself, I'd pick the one that most accurately reflects how much I hate myself at that moment.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 43 points 1 year ago* (13 children)

    The A&W thing is more about Americans sucking ass at math than the difference between a wider or taller burger.

    They had a 1/3lb burger and dipshits thought the 1/4lb was bigger because they don't understand fractions.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (13 replies)
    [–] 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    This is a dumb response. Wider is easier to fit in your mouth and doesnt fall apart. Taller is just a mess and challenge to eat

    TLDR: it's not a volume issue, its a distribution

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    Exactly. Where I used to work there was a greasy cafe type place around the corner and the baps got wider the more stuff you ordered. If you ordered the Full Monty the burger bap was wider than my head. MY HEAD.
    You're damn right I would order it every time I went in. It was glorious...and very unhealthy, but also glorious.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (15 children)

    A&W tried something like this. Sold a 1/3 pound burger because its bigger than the popular Quarter Pounder sold by its competition, larger than a Whopper even. It undersold and when people were asked why; it turns out people think 1/3 is less than 1/4. By the numbers, here.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Big burgers should just be two burgers

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 29 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    But wider = more taste surface. See smash burgers. Taller is just... more burger to toppings ratio. Diminishing returns, imo.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 24 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    In my boyfriend's hometown they used to have this restaurant that served this thing called a hubcap burger

    And it was indeed, wide enough to be the hubcap of a car, while being basically flat.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] [S] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    I think wider is better so you don't have to unhinge your jaw like a snake to eat it.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I mean it worked for subway. Until they started skimping

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Their success came from it being specifically longer. It's much harder to visualise a bigger surface area, like how a 10 inch pizza is bigger than two 7 inch pizzas. Subway on the other hand only stretches it in one axis, so the number goes up faster.

    I don't want long burgers, although I don't know why. Big fan of the circle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago (19 children)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Food for thought: a sufficiently tall and narrow burger ain't a burger anymore, when it's roughly spherical rather than roughly cylindrical it's also not a burger and if it's large and brick-like it's yet something else.

    spoilerCevapcici Kofta; Meatball; Meatloaf.

    So burger is a geometrically bound dish definition.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)

    It's not a comparison of size, it's just the formatting of the sandwich to fit better with the way the human jaw is made... What a dumb argument

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    It's true. I'm a bartender. When I serve a drink in a to-go cup I sometimes get people bitching "oh, that's all I get?" and then I passive aggressively demonstrate to them that it's the same as it would be in a pint glass but it's just shorter and wider.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Literally at my restaurant right now the burger with 3 smaller patties is more popular than the burger with 2 bigger patties. Same total amount of meat, just taller on a smaller bun...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Nobody said it. So be it...

    A regular size, ⅓lb burger is plenty for anybody. If it was unsatisfying, use better ingredients or stronger flavours.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Thanks to pizza, even Americans are familiar with the concept of wide

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Burgers should neither be taller nor wider. Just give me two normal sized burgers.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›