Ask A&W (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by to c/memes@lemmy.world
 

Edit: It will never cease to make me laugh that I get more genuinely serious discussion comments on my meme posts in /c/Memes than anywhere else. I'm not hating, I love it.

Edit 2: Chicago-Style deep dish pizza isn't pizza go fuck yourself

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 27 points 1 year ago (18 children)
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Never forget that the 1/3 pounder failed because people were too dumb to realize that 1/3 is bigger than 1/4…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Would never have happened if 'murica used metrics lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    We'd have the 200 gram'er or whatever a quarter of a pound is in grams

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Bad labeling, they should have called it the 150. People will assume that means 50% more, which is kinda close. For any legal matter they can say it refers to 150 grams, which is dead accurate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    The vast majority of people do not understand fractions. Even math teachers do not understand fractions. I quiver in horror every time a student says the words “cross multiply” because I am about to see some gruesome debasement of mathematics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I had to remind myself exactly what the point of cross multiplying is.

    …it’s essentially just a label given to a specific set of algebraic operations. That it even has a name seems stupid to me. We shouldn’t focus on memorizing specific cases like this when understanding why it works will get you there just as quickly. Heck in the case of cross multiplying, I think it works against the interests of the students’ learning. It’s a shortcut that hides the fact that you’re multiplying both sides by both denominators, when “do the same thing on both sides of the equals sign” is algebra 101.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Exactly. The problem is that they will also start “cross multiplying” any time they see a fraction. “Okay, so what do I need to do if I want to add 3/4 + 1/3?” And then they’ll say “cross multiply”?

    Just say - “hey, the way to get rid of the denominators is to multiply everything by the LCD.” Then it works in all cases. No weird “one trick” that doesn’t really teach them anything.

    (But, where I live - the people teaching math don’t understand math lol.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Broke: Intuitive responses may not be accurate and experimental experience is necessary to enjoy a fuller understanding of the world

    Woke: People are idiots

    Bespoke: Andrew Tate Voice

    A 1995 experiment found that 50% of undergraduate males and 25% of females performed "very well" on the task and 20% of males and 35% of females performed "poorly".

    followed by a series of extremely misogynist noises

  • source
  • parent