277
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Welp

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 133 points 1 month ago

Players can only access the lowest rank of competitive gameplay for free, and access to any higher levels costs a subscription fee of $2.50 a month. That's right, you'll need a subscription to play GeoGuessr on Steam, for some reason.

Not only is this price point bizarre for a game that you can literally just hop into similar browser versions and play for free, but [...]

GeoGuessr has required a subscription to actually play for a while now. I think they had a very limited Free tier until 2024, but it was not a great experience. The developers claim that they need to charge a subscription fee because they need to pay Google for the Streetview API access. To me, that seems plausible and would justify a subscription model (as opposed to a one-time purchase).

On the other hand, OpenGuessr seems to be a free alternative that offers a very similar game. That certainly seems like a better alternative if it's sustainable.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago

I understand the subscription model is required since every player is bound to cost them money for every round, but apparently even if you're already subscribed to GeoGuessr you have to pay again for the Steam version which is absurd to me.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that seems quite weird and not customer friendly at all. I was wondering if it has something to do with Steam's in-game purchase conditions (mostly the fee).

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure if it's just because Ubisoft has a special contract but for Trackmania I'm able to pay the subscription either through Ubisoft directly or through Steam.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The steam version of trackmania is quite weird - I looked for a way to pay for it through steam for a while before resignedly going into the Ubisoft payment in the overlay... Only to be directed to steam for payment. I'm not sure if it's even possible to pay through Ubisoft when launching it from steam.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Geotastic is another great alternative that is funded by donations and ads (which you can remove by donating once)

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

They also show you how much API calls cost you incurred, which is nice. That way I know how much of my donation only offsets what I use and how much I actually donate to development

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah I enjoyed GeoGuessr and wishlisted it in Steam when it was announced. Got an email from Steam saying it was available and opened the store page to see the overwhelmingly negative reviews.

I've played OpenGuessr and it's pretty close to the same experience, I never do versus or anything, just a casual player. I did notice it tended to put me in the same countries quite often, like 8 instances of Brazil and 3 in the Philippines in 20 rounds, but still enjoyable.

[-] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago

I'm assuming it has to do with paying for the Google map api calls. If that's what it is they should say so if that's not what it is they are scummy

[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago

I think it was obvious that it was never going to be a free game again. The problem is making it look like it's free to play and then hitting the player with a paywall after a few games. Also, the subscription model is shitty. I would readily put down a onetime payment for something that works as least as good as the web version, which is a lot more polished than the free alternatives I've seen. But I refuse to buy into this subscription model.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You can thank Google for that - they are charging for every API call. A one time payment would either have to be ridiculously high, or it could ruin GeoGuessr.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I will thank both for no business with either of them.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago

I had to look way too hard just to figure out what the fuck the monetization scheme is on that article that kept repeating the headline 3 times, holy shit

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Blame Google, that's what it costs to use their api. Once upon a time geoguessr was free but Google and their infinite money took it away from the few people who even played the game back then

Haven't looked into this but if steam is the exact same game as the web version then it's worth the subscription fee. In fact geoguessr and tidal are the only two subscription services I pay for. Studying the map makes you way smarter

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

I've been starting to use Geostatic instead, it looks like a really nice alternative to Geoguesser, their economic model looks a lot nicer.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

A flat subscription fee is blameless.

Don't make it sound like they added $50 hats.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

People, their service has material costs, and the fee is minuscule.

This is a completely above-board business model. This is not the bottomless pit of "microtransactions" that needs to become illegal. It's how you're supposed to fund a thing that costs money to run.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I always thought that given that personal use of google street maps os free for the user. It would be really easy to just make a copy of that game for free relying on scrapping instead of api calls.

Insert chad scrapper vs virgin API user meme.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Geoguesser is way too proud of their product to be charging money for it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
277 points (97.9% liked)

Games

20153 readers
706 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS