this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15915 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can lead a horse to water but...

but I'm not confortable with all these powerful politician teaming against this one guy. It sounds to me like all the big kids in school beating up the smallest kid in the class and stealing their lunch money.

Oh no, this poor, poor..

*checks notes*

..literally richest man in the world, still the richest American ever to live in relation to GDP, whose company at its peak controlled close to 90% of the entire oil market in the US, who was so wealthy he literally became a synonym for being insanely rich.

I mean, I don't know about you, but I personally can't think of a less ill fitting analogy than calling Rockefeller or Standard Oil "the little guy". The guy is literally still a synonym for being crazy wealthy even a century after the fact.

But to answer your question, no. Generally the consensus in the US is that antitrust has been too weak in recent times.

https://equitablegrowth.org/competitive-edge-principles-and-presumptions-for-u-s-vertical-merger-enforcement-policy/

The OP's reply...

Thank you for the information.

I don't think you shouldn't have empathy with someone just because is well off. Especially since he was poweless against the politicians.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

John D. Rockefeller didn't hold any political offices of his own, so how could he have defended himself?

Uh, by being filthy fucking rich?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

ah yes, John D. Rockefeller famous for not having a private army that fire bombed and massacred striking coal miners. Wait, hold on. I'm hearing just now that he did have a private army that did that. Uhh, hold on... It was a private army and the Colorado National Guard? That doesn't make sense he shouldn't have any political power - he's not a politician.

No, no, you're right - he's the underdog in this situation. There were 1000s of coal miners and he's just one guy.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

poor fucking john d. rockefeller becoming a slightly-less-unfathomably rich person boohoo

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Isn't it hilarious anti trust laws were introduced to the US to break up unions lmfao

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'm pro the concept of trust so I'm going to say no.