this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
850 points (99.5% liked)

Linux

7128 readers
249 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Fedora is better than Ubuntu?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Generally yes

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ubuntu fucking sucks, every distro is better than Ubuntu

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm using Linux mint, I think it's build on Ubuntu. It's all i know, but I hear arch is awful for beginners.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ubuntu is based on Debian so regular Mint is actually 2 levels down from upstream. But Mint has started offering a Debian base recently called LMDE if you want to check it out.

As for whether Arch is bad for beginners. Kinda. It's a DIY distro, assuming you can follow tutorials and guides it's pretty straight forward, especially with the archinstall script. But if you're uncomfortable with a terminal install, you can try out EndeavourOS which features a full gui install and a few tweaks to make it easier on beginners.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Yes

  1. It has more up to date packages (while being reasonably stable), their implementation of gnome is essentially vanilla so its easier to build off of as a base (unless you like Ubuntus extensions and fonts but tbh you can always add those yourself)
  2. Their KDE edition (starting from the recently released version 42) is no longer a spin so it should get as much attention as Workstation (Gnome)
  3. DNF is arguably much better than APT and especially with the new improvements its seen
  4. Fedora handles snapshots much better (btrfs)
  5. There are more extensive third party repos on fedora
  6. They dont shove snaps down your throat
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

It depends. In my experience it’s less stable but has newer packages.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I switched a while go and haven’t regretted it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

It’s -$140 in my area. Additionally, the 2 other models I picked first didn’t have that option at all.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

I wish other choices in life were this easy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

One category "no OS", with also at least 211€ off, would be great. Don't need nothing on my device when I install Arch from scratch anyway. Or nc -lp 42069 > /dev/main/root and cat /dev/sda3 | nc 192.168.178.x -p 42069, recreate /dev/main/swap and reinstall /dev/main/boot. Or just nc -lp 42069 > /dev/nvme0n1 and cat /dev/nvme0n1 | nf 192.168.178.x -p 42069

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wtf I dont have that option when I look at the same laptop on the nz version of the website.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Oh those price tags make me happy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Interesting. Only Fedora seems to be available in Norway.

I'm still 2 years away from a new work laptop (my current one is doing just fine anyway), but when the time comes, I might go for this. Was thinking about going ThinkPad+Linux anyway.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

They will pay you to take it!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Now if only Asus did that as wel, then we'd be balling

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›