163
On Equality (lemmy.ml)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago

more πŸ‘ pantsuit πŸ‘ oligarchs πŸ‘

[-] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The consequence of always choosing the middle ground is that the middle ground will be progressively pulled toward the right.

It's like finding the average of an array of integers. If someone keeps adding negative numbers to the array, eventually the average will be negative. The people who instinctively go "but compromise!!!" without question or criticism are no smarter than a computer blindly computing the mean of a list.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

β€œMeet me in the middle, says the unjust man.

You take a step towards him, he takes a step back.

Meet me in the middle, says the unjust man.”

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

The consequence of always choosing the middle ground is that the middle ground will be progressively pulled toward the right.

You're right. Ronald Reagan is prove for this. Ronald Reagan pulled what FDR did

[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

liberals are the shitty dystopia that we can actually, somewhat, tolerate.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

The "carrot to the stick" some would say.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Did the meaning of "neoliberals" change? Didn't that mean conservative economically liberal people like George W. Bush and Dick Cheney?

[-] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

Neoliberalism is the guiding ethos of both the Republican and the Democratic parties since at least the 80s. Austerity, deregulation, gutting worker protections and social services. Every single president since Reagan has been a neoliberal of some form.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

A land value tax would fix that

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Georgism isn't enough. We need more than georgism because big corporations in America aren't average merchants who only want to sell their stuff. We need socialism or, minimum, distributism to fix this mess

Edit:

  1. Change "to fix that" to "to fix this mess"
  2. Change "ordinary merchants" to "average merchants"
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
163 points (93.6% liked)

Memes

51732 readers
1249 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS