So, in the state where it's completely OK to sacrifice an innocent child, because the vaccine has "bad stuff" in it - most likely the people saying that could not list ingredients, of course, while other pregnant women who've lost their pregnancies are regularly suspected of sabotaging, or otherwise finding ways to abort their pregnancies. The same state that's also trying to extradite a doctor from NY over sending abortion medication to a TX resident.
So, the lesson here is to not abort an unwanted pregnancy, but instead, let the child be born, then decide you have an issue with vaccinations, before tossing your child into parks, play dates, and the brick & mortar petri-dish all parents know schools to be? I'm just trying to figure out the rules here....so a fetus is a person, but a child is not? Or maybe women don't get to make choices with their bodies, but parents get to make choices for their children's bodies? Of course parents make choices on their children's behalf every day, but these choices?
Oh, and lets not forget, that meanwhile, Catholic Health Initiatives-Iowa, a faith-based health care provider, is arguing in a medical malpractice case that the loss of an unborn child does not equate to the death of a “person” for the purpose of calculating damage awards. Gee, what an awfully convenient twist in the rules, when money enters the scene - depending upon how this all plays out.