this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
381 points (96.4% liked)

Television

683 readers
525 users here now

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities


Other Television Communities

:

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.

  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.

  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.

  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.

  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.

  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags. ****

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The Rogue storyline proves that New Who has a writing problem that has nothing to do with being too woke, and, in fact, at least in parts more with being not woke enough. What reason could there be to hint at, introduce, develop, carry out, end, and bury a love interest all within one single episode, if not as concession for people against those story line to be able to avoid it altogether? Disney isn't actually progressive, they never were, and where corporate pride/POC representation is implemented it's because the cost calculation tells them it pays off, not because they actually represent any of those values.

The Doctor would never give up on anyone. Heck, in the next episode he cried more about some random guard post than the man who proposed to him. Until he at least attempts to get Rogue back I will have to assume the Doctor has either been replaced by some kind of doppelganger, or the writers at Disney lack the balls to actually portray a modern and gay Doctor after all.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

They just don't want to take credit for making doctor who suck themselves. Doctor who has always been woke, but now it just sucks

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I've always loved the themes doctor who tries to address in its episodes, but it's sad in the most recent seasons they seem to have lost any form of subtlety/intelligence...

It used to be episodes showing you a moral dilemma, raising the question and often making it clear there is no perfect solution. The characters would make choice, maybe not the ones you'd make, but from understandable motivations. Sometimes the bad guys would have understandable motivations, and you'd feel sorry for them.

Lately it has been so black & white. More like "see this guy, he represents trump, trump is bad, he is bad". No dilemmas, no raising questions, not letting you think for yourself or challenging your beliefs. More like "this is good, this is bad, don't think more about it please".

I also don't think doctor who has become more woke, but it has become so much less intelligent, no longer considering the viewer as a person capable of reaching their own conclusions. Everything has to be clear and black and white. And if you don't agree with the protagonists you're bad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Agreed. Not sure how much the Disney distribution deal has affected how they handle subtlety. Or just a new show runner that might just not be as good.

I found Steven Moffat to be very good while Russel T Davis has had some excellent moments during his first run, with true existential terror surfacing in the show, lately it has become a Disney ride.

Not sure if he lost some key contributor that gave the show an edge or they decided to try to bring a younger audience in. It doesn’t feel like it has the gravitas it had there for a while.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don’t see people defending the newer shows by saying the writing is great or the plot tight. I just see arguments about politics and social messages.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The show turned to shit many years ago, way before any wokeness. There's nothing to defend.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The corporations are just using the culture war to deflect any criticism against the bad product they made. Like criticize the new Assasins Creed or Snow White and people, especially the gauche caviar press, will call you a racist, even when you weren’t even criticizing the “wokeness”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

this is what doctor who does. Just like in the 80s. It has it's ups and down, but its always changing. That's what makes it special. The doctor regenerates, the show-runner changes and the show moves on. It's not like the other shows that just get cancelled. It's doctor who. It's the longest running sci-fi show in the world.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I look forward to future Dr Whos.

I’ve been watching that show for decades, and I have seen the ups and downs.

This cycle of shoddy work is unique because of the era. But if there is any luck I hope to see better dr who later, followed by something equally bad but different.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

I feel that the whole "Woke/DEI" era will be remembered as a poorly timed inflection point. On one hand, you had the media conglomerates, who, instead of investing in original content decided to put stock in continuations of established franchises which often had poor writing and were poorly executed. These works also just happened to have a "diversity" angel to them. At the same time, we saw the increase in right wing voices online that started to infiltrate the fandoms of those already established franchises.

Social media algorithms also began to push this kind of content to a wider audience. How many times have you seen a random Youtube video with titles like " X is WOKE PROPAGANDA TRASH! Hollywoke is in DECLINE! " appear in your feed or homepage? If the work in question was a critical flop (i.e. terrible), it was not a flop because of creative deficiencies. No, it was a flop because it had a non-binary black character!

You never heard legitimate criticisms like "Hollywood is putting profits before good entertainment" or "[Show or movie] had poor writing, bad acting, terrible direction and didn't contribute anything to already established canon."

Take Deep Space 9 as an example. A great show with a very diverse cast but that diversity would be useless if the characters weren't as fleshed out as they were. Now imagine what the discourse around DS9 would look like if it were made today:

"A New BLACK Protagonist? Star Trek Has Gone WOKE!"

"Jadzia Dax and Odo: Trans Ideology PROPAGANDA?!"

When a new piece of media comes out and there is a massive stir attached to it, ask yourself this: is the criticism warranted or is it ideology driven?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The people who cheer for the replacement of historically caucasian/male gender roles with minority actors/women, are the same people who protest the replacement of historically minority/women roles with caucasian/male actors. And they wonder why there's push back.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It depends on context. Doctor Who is a fictional character. Historical figures are not. It isn't hard to understand why there are different reactions there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Scarlet Johansen as the Major in Ghost in the Shell Tilda Swinton as the Ancient One in Dr Strange Controversy around characters like Iron Fist etc

Asian fictional characters often get white washed. Results in protests from minority groups who feel they're being denied representation in their own culture's created artwork, and roles in movies/shows -- just like how replacing caucasian fictional characters results in protests from groups who feel they're having their cultural representation in media suppressed by minority interests. But whatever man. Guess those dont count.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

The Major is literally a full cyborg, the Scar Jo replacement didn't bother me too much. The ancient one was a Tibetan monk and China actively tries to repress Buddhist representation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I know nothing about those particular shows or films. I would expect a US remake of a show or film to possibly do recasts.

Does this upset you? I believe Thailand also did a modern reimagining of Snow White too, with a Thai actress playing the role.

Doctor Who has always been a character who can regenerate and reform by design. They're an alien species. I'd argue its more important they're eccentric guile heroes in performance than their sex or race.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So the argument is what, that the white people who had a 'role model' for their kids shouldn't be annoyed that the industry is removing that role model, because race shouldn't matter. But also that race representation matters, and that it's important for other races to have representation by taking over the roles of those figures.

It doesn't upset me, it just doesn't make sense to me. Like I accept that parents want to have positive role models that 'look like' their kids, as it helps kids development. So it makes sense that minority groups want to see themselves represented as such in media, and that they'd celebrate established characters being swapped over to be their race/gender. However, that same line of thinking explains why white people are annoyed that their kids are 'losing' role models that 'look like them'. If you assert that 'race matters' (and I accept that it does for kids), then it seems reasonable to be annoyed that those characters are being 'taken away' for practically the same reason that it seems reasonable for minority groups to be happy to see themselves represented. If race representation matters for the character and kids having positive role models, than its arguably worse to disenfranchise the larger group of kids.

I mean, we're busy watching young guys flock to alpha dumbass influencer bros, in part because there are fewer and fewer positive role models for them to look up to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

So the argument is what, that the white people who had a ‘role model’ for their kids shouldn’t be annoyed that the industry is removing that role model, because race shouldn’t matter. But also that race representation matters, and that it’s important for other races to have representation by taking over the roles of those figures.

Regarding Doctor Who, Nguti will not be the Doctor forever. He's just one of many. Whether or not he was specifically chosen because he's black or not, I don't know, but I don't see any inherent problem with the Doctor being black. Race shouldn't be core to the identity of the doctor.

I mean, we’re busy watching young guys flock to alpha dumbass influencer bros, in part because there are fewer and fewer positive role models for them to look up to.

I think this is a much wider issue beyond the casting for Doctor Who. I'd argue the general decline of entertainment monoculture in general plays more of a role here than any particular creative decision for remakes or reimagining of TV series and films.

[–] [email protected] 120 points 1 week ago (8 children)

If they think Doctor Who has "gone" woke, they have not been watching.

I remember Captain Jack Harkness flirting with anything that moves, regardless of gender identity or species.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

These are the same people who say Star Trek has gone woke.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Or that Rage Against the Machine has gone political

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

They had a black astronaut in 1966.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago

The last time I was sentenced to death, I ordered four hyper-vodkas for my breakfast. All a bit of a blur after that... I woke up in bed with both of my executioners. Lovely couple, they stayed in touch! Can't say that about most executioners.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately his behavior continued on set. Creepy dude.

But his character wasn't meant to be creepy, and I need to remember that from time to time.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh damn, that's unfortunate

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago

Context fwiw:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/john-barrowmans-scandals-full-jaw-33702480

My opinions: Was he called out for exposing himself and being incredibly inappropriate? Yes.

Has he apologized and faced consequences? Yes, multiple times, but maybe not enough for some.

Is he a sexual predator? Probably Not.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I have to disagree a bit here, the recent writing has tried to very heavily shoe-horn it in, whereas in the past it was much more naturally present.

I think the worst one for me (before I quit watching) was with the enormous spiders in the hotel run by a very Trumpian figure.

"Trump" wanted to just shoot the enormous spider, but the Doctor stopped him saying "no weapons, ever". The spider then died an agonizing death caused by suffocation on-screen mere seconds later. Her offspring was lured and locked into a storage room with food, after which they would surely either cannibalize themselves or starve. Actually shooting them would've been a mercy at that point.

When presented with the Doctor's solution versus the "Trump" solution, I felt more sympathy for "Trump". And I fucking hate that guy. That's when I knew the writing just wasn't for me anymore.

There's a reason even the more diehard Whovians, who are very much considered "woke" are tuning out. It's not the cast, it's the writing.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

That engine is woke.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nobody who enjoys Dr Who for what it is, a series of morality tales and social commentary, gives a shit about if the Dr Who is woke or if the lead is man, woman or something between, let alone their ethnicity (though for sake of continuity they better have a british accent of some descriptor.)

What long time Who fans don't like is poorly written and executed stories, for which there has been far too many of in recent years.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

If Doctor Who isn't woke then the showrunner's fuckin something up

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (7 children)

What do we call it when the show has politics you agree with but you still think its too heavy handed and the messaging constantly feels like you're being talked down to?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Patronising. RTD loves to be patronising because he doesn't understand subtlety.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

No effing doubt.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Back in the Tom Baker era, they routinely talked of the Prime Minister as 'she.'

Those shows were made long before Thatcher came to power.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doctor Who is responsible for Margaret Thatcher? Wow, maybe this show does suck after all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

I have more criticism over Disney being involved in production than anything "woke".

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

This reinforces my perspective that when people complain about "woke" media they are complaining about badly written media (which features minorities). The 2005 reboot of Doctor Who has always strongly featured minorities, but the quality has gradually declined season after season. Nobody complained about the bisexual Jack Harkness, who got his own spin-off. Different people gave up at different times -- IMO it was a dumpster fire by season 4 already, but others held on through the Matt Smith era or even the Capaldi era. (Not denying there were good episodes still now and then.) Series 11 was unwatchably bad -- but not because the Doctor was portrayed by a woman.

Similarly, Star Wars: Andor, has a lot of diversity in the cast! It's a great show, best Star Wars media since Episode V in my opinion. But it's Star Wars: The Adept people are calling woke, since it's trash.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

100%. The core problem is inserted politics won't save a bad project, and since the project is bad the only interesting thing to talk about is the inserted politics.

A great project, or even just good, can insert whatever it likes and people will focus on the good parts and the inserted politics won't dominate the conversation.

My rule of thumb: if the only thing you hear about a project is how political it is, then it's a bad project and there is nothing else worth talking about.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Funny seeing you here :) Also hear hear!

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›