this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
139 points (94.8% liked)

Asklemmy

47265 readers
729 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Where would you move to ride out a potential WWIII?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 119 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think we should go to the Winchester, have a nice cold pint, and wait for all of this to blow over.

load more comments (5 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 70 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm one of the lucky ones! Because of my service to our great country fighting against those dirty communists, when the bombs fall my family and I will be safe and sound, underground, in one of the local vaults in our area: Vault 108!

[โ€“] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Oh shit... I just realized that it's only a matter of time until Musk starts building vaults. Probably with a much worse name like vaultX

[โ€“] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago

Dude that's a long since passed look at the vaults in Hawaii with zuck. I hope they choke down there. Remember they all have air filters.

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

It will be a boring name.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 63 points 1 week ago (3 children)

My crazy mom says she's looking to move to Uruguay because when the nukes start falling they will most likely not have a ton of fallout to deal with.

I'm gonna run toward the light in that kind of scenario, personally. Nature will rebuild. In a WWIII scenario, the winner is evolution. Life will, uh, find its way.

[โ€“] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It's five and I'm driving home again

It's hard to believe that it's my last time

The man on the wireless cries again

"It's over, it's over"

It's late and I'm with my love alone

We drink to forget the coming storm

We love to the sound of our favorite song

Over and over

Dancing, with tears in my eyes

Weeping for the memory of a life gone by

Dancing, with tears in my eyes

Living out a memory of a love that died

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Depends, are we riding out the rise of fascism or riding out WWIII? Those are two highly different scenarios.

Either way, a Pacific island sounds nice.

[โ€“] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not with rising sea levels

[โ€“] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Fair. A boat anchored at a Pacific Island, while they exist.

Maybe I'll dock at the Pacific garbage patch and distill my fuel from microplastics.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A proto-Waterworld scenario!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm staying right here in the imperial core where I can inflict the most damage when the time comes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just teleport me to L3 and be done with it. Earth-Moon, Sun-Earth, doesn't matter.

[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Bold to presume that we would want to survive it.

Fwiw Musk says that he wants to leave Earth and go to Mars, which is great news for the rest of us:-).

[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

To be fair, in Musk's fantasy Mars is the easier planet to live on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (7 children)

While Latin America is, overall, a good choice, it's important to recognize that the mask off fascism we are seeing from the US will only increase the meddling they already do on their "backyard", so keep that in mind.

load more comments (7 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Everyone saying Latin America has absolutely no clue about what Latin America is, lol. The only place safe from fascism rn is either another planet or being dead.

load more comments (5 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Argentina probably. Generally the southern hemisphere is pretty safe. Nobody's wasting nukes on brown people, except maybe Israel.

[โ€“] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wouldn't bet on argentina. They've got their own dickhead in chief who's also waging war against progress.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Argentinians are mostly white.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Somewhere in South America. Always wanted to go the Falklands. In reality I don't have the money for that. So I'm here on this hell ride to the bitter end.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

If the world goes to shit and the UK is fighting with Russia, would Milei try to grab the Falklands?

[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (15 children)

Where would you move to ride out a potential WWIII?

Australia. There really is no better place in the event of nuclear war. It's a continent-island, meaning easy to defend, it grows and can build just about anything, and being in the southern hemisphere it should be safe from nuclear winter.

Specifically, a rural property somewhere agricultural. Maybe Queensland or Tasmania.

If you could move anywhere to minimize the impact on you of the worldwide rise of fascism...

That's almost a different question, though. Whichever European country is the most securely democratic. There's lots of non-war ways fascism can suck aggressively.

load more comments (15 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Most of the violence and oppression gets exported, so it's probably best to just sit tight here in the heart of the empire.

load more comments (5 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

We'll know what the right answer was after it passes.

[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think I already live in one of the places least likely to be involved in WW3

The countryside of Brazil

In the previous two World Wars Brazil only got involved because people pressured the president to do so, otherwise we could have just sat the entire thing out.

Like, life will get shittier here too, but it is VIOLENTLY unlikely that there will be any fighting in our soil or even a draft to send soldiers to the war. (and I aggressively doubt there will be any kind of nuke-related mutually assured destruction shenanigans. The elites don't benefit from causing the apocalypse)

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

London. Thanks to the artefacts in the British Museum, nobody will dare to throw bombs there.

[โ€“] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Famously, it didn't stop the Nazis.

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Uruguay, New Zealand, or SE Asia

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ