this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
321 points (99.4% liked)

politics

22611 readers
4749 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump’s recent executive order on elections includes a provision allowing the DOJ to withhold federal funding from states that do not enter into agreements on election law violations and voter roll maintenance.

Critics argue this exceeds presidential authority and could coerce states into ceding control over election administration.

Experts warn it could undermine state autonomy and lead to punitive funding cuts over routine voter roll maintenance errors.

Legal analysts predict challenges, citing potential overreach and conflict with congressional authority.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 117 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This is the beginning of them attempting to take over the entire voting system and turn it into a circus where the winner is whoever they pick

[–] [email protected] 57 points 4 days ago

I hate that it's stuff like this that we have to tell people "I told you so" about.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Everything should be left to the states unless it shouldn't.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And suddenly nobody cared about states rights and the constitution anymore

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago

Or congress or the judiciary

[–] [email protected] 62 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I hate the phrase "critics say" when used in the media like this. It's a mealy-mouthed way of describing what is actually fact and gives credence to the bullshit they're trying to pull.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

YES, I'm so sick of this wording!! It hides how fucking awful the actions being taken are.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 days ago

Executive orders are not laws.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

They have the barest majority in both houses of congress, and they can't afford to lose either one, and have investigatory committees come under Democrat control. Unfortunately for the Nazis, things are falling into place for the 2026 midterm to be an opposition party bloodbath, like the 2010 midterm, possibly losing BOTH houses.

So the Nazis can't have a fair election in 2026, or they'll almost certainly lose. This is an attempt to Federalize the election system, a concept so anathema to our Democracy that Republicans would have started a Civil War if Dems had tried it. By bringing the election system directly under his control, he can easily rig it, and give himself supermajorities in both houses, allowing any impeachments he wants.

This morning on Meet The Press, MAGA Rep Markwayne "Hillbilly Is In The Name" Mullins was bragging about how HitlerPig always has a Plan A, B, C, D, etc. We know that from when he called off his Insurrection, making us think it was over, not knowing that he was hoping his Plan B, the audacious False Elctors Plot, would work instead.

So if this doesn't work, he will have a Plan B, and beyond. At some point he will declare Martial Law, and suspend elections. The best timing on that will be at the end of next summer, after a long violent protest season. Perhaps he will wait until college opens in the Fall, and make his worst attack on a "liberal" campus he hates.

Avoiding the 2026 mid-terms is there biggest priority right now. Once they get past that, the 2028 election, and his third term, will be up.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

The states that refuse to give DOJ control of elections should just stop sending tax revenue to the federal government. California is like the 4th or 5th largest economy in the world. If NY and Cali stopped sending $$ then he couldn't fund shit!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Critics argue this exceeds presidential authority…

They seem to… argue a lot of things. If only arguing enacted change.

And…

Legal analysts predict challenges, citing potential overreach and conflict with congressional authority.

Were these “legal analysts” 12 year old kids? Because this is something so obvious that all It takes is one to notice it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago

Legal analysts predict challenges, citing potential overreach and conflict with congressional authority.

So a standard Trump executive order then.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

The same DOJ he routinely ignores? That doj?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Really?

Like he really wants to do that?

Fine. Do it. See which states halt their contributions. Then good luck funding those other states. The states he wants election authority in can afford to get cut off. The ones he doesn't need it in are parasite states anyway.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How would states stop the flow of taxpayer money out?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

With the IRS gutted, it may be a matter of not having withholding on your paycheck, and then sending in blank tax forms every year.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

He doesn't seem to want order, and the bills paid at the end of the month.

I think breaking up the Republic would be fine with him. No commitment to the IDEALS of the USA.

Say what you will about what the US has been, just watch "The West Wing" if you want to see an example of what drives people who care about making this country function better.

Sure it's fiction, but it's the fictions that make living in the real world possible.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I'm calling it right now. Bingo card for 2025.

Trump will question the legitimacy of the conservative's version of the sacred "founding fathers" before mid year.

If he already did... Well shit i dunno I'm just a moron on the Internet.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

The party of states rights, or not.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

I’m increasingly getting the impression that this whole ‘union of states’ thing is a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

What's crazy is that in Canada we couldn't imagine federal elections being handled by the provinces and the centralization means voting conditions are pretty much the same over the whole country (except in very remote location where they send planes to let people vote), but in the US centralizing it with the current administration is just scary...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Pull their funding and you also should lose all their votes, although in this upside down I could see some states just going along with it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Don Mangolini: "Be a shame if we have to pull your funding cause you decide not to work with us..."

🙄 🙄