Could it be he has issues with freedom of speech/opinion (actually freedom in general) ? Asking for a friend

Still cracks me up that "fact-checking" is taken to be such an offensive act. "Oh, sorry for correcting your lies! I suppose being exposed as a fraud could interfere with your plans to exploit the public..."

Anyone that has a beef with sites designed to share objective, factual information is someone who benefits from lying or at very least keeping the truth under wraps

I should donate to Wikipedia

a billion dollars he could fund his own nazipedia.org

'which is how he prefers to be identified' ... hmnnn - so he CHOOSES to IDENTIFY as one thing and doesn't like it when people don't allow him to use his preferred identificaiton?

They're just mad that reality has a left-wing bias.

Just donated to Wikipedia. Will do every time this fuckers brings it up

Just donated. You should too.

I love donating to Wikipedia because there’s so few FREE things anymore, and it’s one that benefits every single person on the planet.

“This is not the first time Musk has gone after the site. In December, he posted on X, “Stop donating to Wokepedia.” And that wasn’t even his first bad Wikipedia pun. “I will give them a billion dollars if they change their name to Dickipedia,” he wrote, in an October, 2023, post.

You can't buy it, but you can go create a conservative fork called whatever you want, and you can fund its operation. If people think that it's better, they can choose to use it.

There's a Conservapedia, which I would call pretty off-the-rails; people have tried this before.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservapedia

Conservapedia (/kənˌsɜː(r)vəˈpiːdiə/; kən-SU(R)-və-PEE-di-ə) is an English-language, wiki-based, online encyclopedia written from a self-described American conservative[2] and fundamentalist Christian[3] point of view. The website was established in 2006 by American attorney and activist Andrew Schlafly, son of Phyllis Schlafly,[4][5] to counter what he perceived as a liberal bias on Wikipedia.[6][7] It uses editorials and a wiki-based system for content generation.

Examples of Conservapedia's ideology include its accusations against and strong criticism of former US president Barack Obama—including advocacy of Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories[8]—along with criticisms of atheism, feminism, homosexuality, the Democratic Party, and evolution. Conservapedia views Albert Einstein's theory of relativity as promoting moral relativism,[9] claims that abortion increases risk of breast cancer, praises Republican politicians, supports celebrities and artistic works it believes represent moral standards in line with Christian family values, and espouses fundamentalist Christian doctrines such as Young Earth creationism.[10][11] Conservapedia's "Conservative Bible Project" is a crowd-sourced retranslation of the English-language Bible which the site says to be "free of corruption by liberal untruths."[12]

*has a problem with facts

Of course he does, the site is filled with objective truths, which always makes him look bad.

Donate. How many times a day do you use Wikipedia? It would be shit if it became another Fandom style wiki. With an ad every 3rd word.

Fascists always have problems with publicly available knowledge.

Started a monthly 3 dollar donation when baby Nazi started shit talking Wikipedia some months ago.

Conservativism is rooted in vibes and feelings, and false narratives to support those feelings. This is why they hate knowledge and people who attain it.

It's a disease of the mind, it's like they would rather be animal than human

Donate to wikipedia.

I miss the times when people like this was seen as mentally ill.

Can't shake the feeling Musk doesn't like Wikipedia because Musk only likes facts he can use.

Enjoy my small donation Wikipedia.

I happily donate to Wikipedia every year :)

You can download Wikipedia and other stuff for offline access here.

download.kiwix.org

Facts don't care about your feelings, Elon.