top 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 3 years ago (4 children)

wtf, is this just obscured javascript?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children)

    It looks like it's decompiled from something, so all the variable names are missing and instead presented with whatever index they had in the binary.

    But that's just a wild guess. I don't know what actual decompiled code looks like.

    Edit: scratch that, it's just obfuscated code to make it harder to copy.

    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11932567/found-this-nasty-code-i-wonder-what-it-does-should-i-be-worried#11932708

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I thought it was decompiled code at first to, but the function names are still real words. It's almost like it was manually obfuscated by replacing all the variable names.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    An LLM could probably solve this much quicker than a human.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Litterally me, before ChatGPT was a thing

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago
    [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    This is a nightmare material

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    A nightmare of mine, prob all JS code too

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›