▲ 419 ▼ bugs (discuss.tchncs.de) submitted 3 years ago by produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml 16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] NoisyFlake@lemm.ee 16 points 3 years ago (4 children) wtf, is this just obscured javascript? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 22 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children) It looks like it's decompiled from something, so all the variable names are missing and instead presented with whatever index they had in the binary. But that's just a wild guess. I don't know what actual decompiled code looks like. Edit: scratch that, it's just obfuscated code to make it harder to copy. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11932567/found-this-nasty-code-i-wonder-what-it-does-should-i-be-worried#11932708 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SurpriseWaterfall@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) I thought it was decompiled code at first to, but the function names are still real words. It's almost like it was manually obfuscated by replacing all the variable names. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 years ago Found it. It's just obfuscated to make it harder to copy. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11932567/found-this-nasty-code-i-wonder-what-it-does-should-i-be-worried#11932708 permalink fedilink source parent [–] hemmes@vlemmy.net 1 point 3 years ago I don’t think you’re far off because obfuscated code usually has less structured variable references. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 22 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (3 children) It looks like it's decompiled from something, so all the variable names are missing and instead presented with whatever index they had in the binary. But that's just a wild guess. I don't know what actual decompiled code looks like. Edit: scratch that, it's just obfuscated code to make it harder to copy. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11932567/found-this-nasty-code-i-wonder-what-it-does-should-i-be-worried#11932708 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SurpriseWaterfall@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) I thought it was decompiled code at first to, but the function names are still real words. It's almost like it was manually obfuscated by replacing all the variable names. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 years ago Found it. It's just obfuscated to make it harder to copy. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11932567/found-this-nasty-code-i-wonder-what-it-does-should-i-be-worried#11932708 permalink fedilink source parent [–] hemmes@vlemmy.net 1 point 3 years ago I don’t think you’re far off because obfuscated code usually has less structured variable references. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SurpriseWaterfall@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 years ago (1 child) I thought it was decompiled code at first to, but the function names are still real words. It's almost like it was manually obfuscated by replacing all the variable names. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 years ago Found it. It's just obfuscated to make it harder to copy. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11932567/found-this-nasty-code-i-wonder-what-it-does-should-i-be-worried#11932708 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 years ago Found it. It's just obfuscated to make it harder to copy. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11932567/found-this-nasty-code-i-wonder-what-it-does-should-i-be-worried#11932708 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hemmes@vlemmy.net 1 point 3 years ago I don’t think you’re far off because obfuscated code usually has less structured variable references. permalink fedilink source parent
