this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
131 points (99.2% liked)

World News

34003 readers
663 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As Washington ramps up its pressure on Zelenskyy to step aside, his rivals are talking to Trump’s team.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And like so history repeats itself.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Seriously. Buying into western rhetoric is one of the stupidest things non-member nations can do.

They don't realize that westerners only look out for their own interests. If you're not part of their "in-group" then they will only use you for their gain.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Never assume that a country ruling class looks out for the interests of their nation, they only care for their own interests. Before the complete takeover of financial capital and thus its globalization, industrial capitalists still had an interest in the development of their own nation since their capital was in their own nation. Now they could hardly give a shit if their country goes to shit since they have their money capital elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Even if you are in the 'in-group' you still risk getting shanked if it so suits the big boys. it's still the world of geopolitics anyway, there are no permanent allies or enemies between states, only interests. Even now US dumps the whole Russia-Ukraine stuff on Europe despite them being the major contributor/co-conspirators to the project. EU is also too stubborn or in too deep to get out of dodge, but still.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You act as if this is not the case for every country in the world, past and present with very few and temporary exceptions

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is a relatively new thing, even for capitalism. The national bourgeoisie used to have a degree of national interest in developing the nation to mantain their factories, farms, etc even their money capital was physically in their country.

Now their money capital is in its majority invested in western institutions and they straight up have no interest in their own nations.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The difference is that the US does not recognize the concept of "win-win". It is all zero sum games for them. In order for the US to gain someone else must lose. This is not the attitude that most other countries adopt.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Other nations don't have the clout that the US has.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago

The US after one month without causing regime change

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I'm so goddamn disgusted.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

With the RUSSIANS, just fucking say it!!!

Four senior members of Donald Trump’s entourage have held secret discussions with some of Kyiv’s top political opponents to Volodymyr Zelenskyy, just as Washington aligns with Moscow in seeking to lever the Ukrainian president out of his job.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Petro Poroshenko the former President of Ukraine, and Yulia Tymoshenko a former Prime Minister of Ukraine are Russian now?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Hey, if you take a realist position this war in the west, you are either a russian, a russian asset or a victim of russian propaganda. Any anti-war or Anti-Zelensky force in Ukraine is by these people's definition most definitely a Russian asset.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Poroshenko who's on record publicly speaking about his genocidal intent behind the bombing of ethnic Russians in Donbas, "may or may not" be working for Russia.

Fucking libs I stg, every bit as racist as conservatives and hardly any brighter.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

Holy shit they are digging really deep in the search for the ultimate ghoul.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Might as well rewrite history and say that in the 1940s, America fought Central European powers with alternative government systems

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

For fucking real. I mean, it is Politico, they're owned by a POS (at least they were last September):

💲 Business Insider & Politico


Owned by Axel Springer SE

In 2021 it was acquired for reportedly over 1 billion USD by Axel Springer SE, a German news publisher and media company. Axel Springer is Europe's largest newspaper publisher and had previously acquired Business Insider. Unlike employees of its German newspapers, the employees of Politico do not have to sign Axel Springer's mission statement that expresses support for Israel and America's and Europe's transatlantic alliance.

Source

Mathias Döpfner is CEO

He is the CEO and 22% owner of media group Axel Springer SE. From 2016 to 2022 he was president of the Federal Association of Digital Publishers and Newspaper Publishers (BDZV).

In 2020, Friede Springer appointed Mathias Döpfner as her successor through a combination of gifting, selling, and transferring voting rights associated with her shares in the company. As part of this transition, Springer sold a 4.1% share directly to Döpfner and gifted him an additional 15%, thereby increasing his direct ownership to 22%. Furthermore, Springer transferred to Döpfner the voting rights for her remaining 22% stake in the company.

In February 2023 The Economist reported on Döpfner's plans to expand the Springer group's media presence in the United States.

Source

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I saw news on this yesterday- pretty sure all of Zelenskyy's political opponents unanimously made public statements saying they would not have an election before the end of the war.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

The source says

The 268 parliament members present on Tuesday voted unanimously in support of the Ukrainian president.

While the Ukrainian parliament has 450 members. The article implicitly confirms that much of the parliament is not there at the vote when it says that the threshold for passing the resolution is 226 votes.

So this article is not actually saying that the opposition has given approval to Zelensky's term (though they might have, idk).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And it didn’t work. Zelinskyy’s opponents said fuck that and fuck you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Once again libs will be taken by surprise when tHe tAnKiEs turn out to be right and Zelensky either gets with the program or gets acquainted with the wall.