this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
636 points (97.3% liked)

Open Source

33663 readers
486 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've seen many threads suggesting products but they often don't mention FOSS projects, which should always be preferred to corporate software. With FOSS you are already boycotting capitalism, on either side. Free and Open Source ignores borders and shouldn't be categorized in nationalist terms, no matter where some of the maintainers happen to live.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

More like "buy white"

The white supremacists think trump bailed on them so they are desperate to hold the remains of their fourth reich together

And of course they hate FOSS, because they hate freedom

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

I've tried to extol the virtues of FOSS for a long time. Not many people even care about it or their privacy, always parroting the adage "If i do nothing wrong what do I need to worry about" without a further thought.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 day ago (1 children)

FOSS is not American. Foss belongs to literally everyone.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I kept saying it all over the place regarding the fascistic rejection of Russian (as in race) code and got flamed as result. These people use FOSS, especially GNU/GPL software and yet they have no clue about the license themselves.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Weren't Russian contributors (from very specific sanctioned companies) rejected from contributing because of US sanction laws and with Linux Foundation being HQ'd in the US?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I think that was mainly due to the concern of hostile actors committing code to the kernel.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

I think it was US OFAC sanctions

https://www.linuxfoundation.org/blog/navigating-global-regulations-and-open-source-us-ofac-sanctions

https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/23/linus_torvalds_affirms_expulsion_of/ (links to the OFAC sanctions set up after Russia invade Ukraine)

The OFAC sanctions do have quite a few lists, with one of them being "Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions", so it could be fear of harmful actions and not just retaliation for the invasion

[–] [email protected] 82 points 2 days ago

Free software is the antithesis of capitalism. It doesn't make sense to boycott them.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago

I always like to say the fruits of FOSS labour are the common heritage of mankind. It belongs to all of us as a public good, created and maintained by selfless workers. (Nevermind the fact that most FOSS projects are based out of Europe anyways).

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I'm the most anti-American user on here and I agree.

I'd rather use USA-linked free software than Spotify.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Seeing people look for corporate social media alternatives is painful.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 days ago (21 children)

@Irelephant

> "Hey guys, I want to leave X, should I go to Bluesky or Threads? What? Mastodon? Never heard of that. Looks very complicated, I'll pass"
> -- CEO, founder, IT wizz on LinkedIn

Every time!

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 2 days ago (6 children)

lol who is suggesting boycotting foss projects?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I think OP means that one shouldn't boycott FOSS projects just because they are from USA. That said, I don't like to be told what I have to do and don't agree to "FOSS projects, which should always be preferred to corporate software". My pc, my LAN, my rules.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (12 children)

you seem to hold your individual freedoms high, there is a kind of software i think you'll really like

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don’t like to be told what I have to do and don’t agree to “FOSS projects, which should always be preferred to corporate software”. My pc, my LAN, my rules.

...he said, without a hint of irony.

Meanwhile, "my PC, my LAN, my rules" is precisely the reason I do agree with always preferring FOSS to corporate software.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago

Is someone doing that? If it's FOSS it's from the internet.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 days ago (5 children)

From a purely "vote with your wallet" standpoint it doesn't make sense, because there's no money paid. However, one might worry about data/information getting in the hands of a fascist/compromised government. So I think people should judge this themselves case by case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Voting with wallet is oligarchy

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Lol, first time I hear that, as European😆 what a stupid movement..

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Counterpoint: Fedora is a testing bed for Red Hat. One of Red Hat's notable customers is the US military. I'd prefer to stay off that path if I can help it. It's a matter of trust, and it's a matter of indirectly contributing. I've seen people say the same things about Deepin and everyone nods in agreement, but why the hell should I trust a US project, for the same reasons?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago

Honestly this should be a wake call to the FOSS community that we are way too reliant on the US.

Every default we have is US centric and if FOSS is really meant for everyone we should move away from that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Agree with the main point, though disagree that FOSS is "boycotting capitalism", many for-profit companies contribute to FOSS and FOSS can be used by for-profit companies too, much of today's capitalism runs on FOSS.

The point of free software is that it does not have owners, so what exactly are you "boycotting"?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (6 children)

I get it as an European that it means more to me to consume "locally" and to prioritize services that are European-based. But due to the nature of computers and FOSS, borders are redefined and it is more about ideas and politics rather than physical location. However, computers and servers are also physical and submitted to legislations of countries, we cannot ignore laws such as the Patriot act and the power that the American state can have even on FOSS projects.

For me the priority is to use software that match my needs; if I have the choice between an American and an European solution, I'll tend to choose the latter one.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›