this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
36 points (92.9% liked)

Asklemmy

45251 readers
1809 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From Spain here, when we want to speak about USA people we use the term "yankee" or "gringo" rather than "american" cause our americans arent from USA, that terms are correct or mean other things?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 53 minutes ago

Do you not have a term in Spanish?

If y'all use yank, yankee, or gringo, they're all fine.

But, American is fine too. If you're using English, everyone will know what you mean. It isn't like it hasn't been the term used in English for at least a century.

Here the thing. If you're referring to someone from one of the two/three americas, you specify north, central and south. That depends a little on whether you consider all three as discrete areas, or not, but that's the norm in English.

If you want to refer to all people from the americas at once, Americans is also fine. Context will carry which way you're using it. English is fairly easy to make contextual indicators like that.

An example: "oh, Americans love their flag". Which americans are we talking about? The ones with a specific American flag. Which, the statement isn't universally true, it's just an example.

If you aren't using English, it doesn't matter at all, use whatever terminology is the norm in that language.

The reason it doesn't matter is that there really isn't an "American" people in the continental sense. The cultures of the continents don't even have a unifying effect, though you do have some connection between Spanish speaking vs Portuguese, vs native, vs English, etc. The language links in South America are much more significant than the fact that they live on the same continent.

Any time you'd be referring to the entire Americas, or the peoples of them, you'd specify that because there's not a single American continent.

One nation out of all of them being america really isn't a difficulty in conversation. It's a non issue.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Just say "idiots." Source: USA citizen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

No no, he has a point...

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

Being from the USA, I can confidently say “Yankee” is a term that is fairly neutral in meaning. People from the South states use it to refer to basically any American not from the South, and I get the sense people from the UK use it to refer to anyone from the USA.

In my experience, “Gringo” seems to be a term used by Spanish-speakers (even ones from North and South America) to refer to English speakers who think they’re better than everyone, so it appears to be a term with negative connotations

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Texan here. Yankee is definitely not a neutral word to refer to everyone from the USA. Some people down here will fight you over it, but most would just give you a confused look.

I've always understood gringo to mean white person, especially one who can't speak Spanish. The term is sometimes used in Mexican restaurants to let the staff know that you can't deal with too many jalapeños.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

In my experience (as a Brit), people generally only refer to Americans as Yanks in a mildly pejorative way or if we're taking the piss, otherwise it's Americans.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

Southerners are the same way. Nobody calls us yanks as a compliment

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

i believe Brits call Americans "yanks"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

U.K. bloke here…I don’t use it personally, just because, but yeah we say it for anyone from the USA.

When I was about 10 or so someone local to me had a lawsuit because his colleagues called him Yankee and he claimed it was racism, fairly certain he won, but it was an obscure case.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

It's a weird lacuna of the English language, there's no official word for estadounidense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

In Italian we have an equivalent, Statunitensi, but Americani is probably used more often to mean the same thing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The reason for this is simple: the word in English is "American". Because in English speaking countries, it is almost universally the case that we talk about the 7 continents. And in the rare case we talk about 6 continents, it's from merging Europe and Asia (which, frankly, is blatantly a far superior model of the continents), not merging North America and South America.

So "America" unambiguously refers to the country, and there's no need for estadounidense, any more than there's a need for "commonwealthian" for someone from the Commonwealth of Australia.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I think the point the previous user is getting at is that there is no continent of "America" in most English-speaking countries—there is North America and South America.

Canada is in North America but it's not in "America," which without the North/South prefix, will make most English-speaking people assume you mean the US and not the continent Canada and the US are on.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

imo, 'gringo' has no special meaning unless it was given one from a local group. like how "let's go brandon" only makes sense on a specific group.

'yankee' used to have a specific one before, i.e. north-eastern US bros, but it got saturated and now could be used generally. imo, 'yankee' usage has ye olde vibe to it, but maybe that's just me.

EDIT: corrected 'southern', thanks to Denvil

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

thanks! missed that one.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (6 children)

In America, yankee means people from a particular part of America. But we use it here in Australia to mean any American. It's especially fun when people from the south (that is…the south of the country America, not from the continent of South America) take offence at the term IMO.

We also use "seppo" which is an Australian shortening slang of "septic", which is rhyming slang (of the kind used in both Australia and London, England) that comes via "septic tank" via "yank".

Gringo seems strange to me. I thought that was a predominantly Latin American term for white people, and would apply equally well to Americans as Canadians as Australians as (of particular relevance to someone from Spain) English…but only the white of each, so it would seem to me it shouldn't work as synonymous with "American" because it excludes African Americans, Asian Americans, etc. But I'm not Spanish or Latin American, so I might just be misunderstanding the word.

Edit: what yank means depending on where you are (allegedly):

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Hispanic here, I grew up using “gringo” specifically for people from the U.S. despite skin tone.

Canadians are “Canadiense”, English are “Ingles” but United States? “Estadounidense”? It’s sort of like saying “United Statian” but arguably more “correct/proper”

Gringo is just much faster/easier to say.

That being said this can vary a little from one Latin-American country to another.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Seppo, septic tank, yank. Love it! Cockney rhyming slang strikes again?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

Australian rhyming slang in this case, but yeah, it functions in much the same way as Cockney.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

That sounds like the name of a person from Docklands in Melbourne.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Gringo and yankee are both fine. However, it's most correct to refer to people from the USA by their birth state.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Or where they currently live.

Or, the case of NYC Puerto Ricans, both (New Yorican lol)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 30 minutes ago

I suppose it depends on context, but someone who was born in PR, but lives in NYC, is a Puerto Rican. Someone born in NYC to a Puerto Rican family is a New Yorican. Both people are ethnically Puerto Rican, but only one is from Puerto Rico.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Burros como o caralho is Portuguese for USAians.

It translates to something like dumb as fuck.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 hours ago

Dumbfuckistan has a certain ring to it when you put it that way.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I prefer the formal name in spanish of estadounidense (united-statistian) to American.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago

I'm USAian. (just identifying for this thread, i don't call myself that)

would "gringo" include Black USAians? Asian USAians? Spain-born USAians?

from my understanding of "gringo", that doesn't seem to include non-white USAians. Most English monolingual USAians think that means "white guy".

a lot of gen z USAians might not know the word Yankee as a term for USAians. if speaking to them, you might have to explain it's not the baseball team.

maybe it's better to stick with "USAians". it's never been used but it's easy to figure out. other possible choices are:

  • Statesians
  • USAliens
  • USAmericans
  • Staters
  • Stater Tots (re: tater tots)
  • USticles

better yet, call each of us by the state we're each from. that's the safest bet. you know all our 50 state names right? and their official demonyms? 🤣 kidding

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This probably isn’t helpful for referring to all Americans but in the U.S., we use whatever state/regjon within the United States a person is from as the demonym. So, someone from California would be Californian, someone from Texas would be Texan. For a regional example, someone from the Northeast would be a New Englander.

For most of the history of the Republic, the states viewed themselves sort of like EU countries do now: independent states in America that united. It probably wasn’t until the World Wars that it changed.

It can get more complicated, unfortunately. Native Americans would probably use their tribal name instead of the state, for instance. But that’s why we don’t have a demonym and everyone has resorted to USian or USAian on message boards.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I wish Oregonians were called Oregonos instead because sounding like a spice is cool. lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 24 minutes ago (1 children)

Oregonos sounds like part of a complete breakfast.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 minutes ago

Oregano-s and Oregon-O’s. I like it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

Not too sure about gringo but I know yankee is correct, I hear that one a lot from folks I know in the UK.

There's some weird linguistic drift where in the southern US, we call northerners yankees, even though in the rest of the world we're all yankees. Now I'm curious how that started.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

That Southern US usage dates back to at least the US civil war in the 1860s.

But yankee was used to refer to at least some people in what is now the US as early as the 1660s.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yankee

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately the USAians are so dominant in the region of the Americas that they've coopted the term American for most people. My Columbian friend hates when we refer to USAians as Americans because he says "hey we were here first" 😆. But unfortunately that's the way it is.

Yanks or Yankee Doodles is what we used to call them but they get rather upset these days when you call them that. I wouldn't call them gringos because it just sounds unnatural for a Brit to say that seriously.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

I like to look at it this way. The full name of Mexico is the United States of Mexico. But we still call them Mexicans.

It’s totally okay to call people from the United States of America as Americans. Everyone knows what you mean anyways.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

If I want to come off as a pseudo-intellectual I call them Yankee for east-north and Dixie for south-west (but also Florida and the bible belt) and gringo for hispanic Americans. I don't know if any of those terms are really correct to use in that context and my definitions are entirely vibes-based.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I'd say leave east/west out of the Yankee/Dixie dichotomy you're imagining, because every single southeastern state was a slave state that supported the confederacy.

It also falls apart when you go west of the Mississippi River, which was (outside of Texas and California) mostly unincorporated territory during the time of the civil war and not a part of what would have been considered the union or the confederacy at that time.

Also don't refer to Hispanic Americans as "gringo" because that is a term used in Latin America to refer to people who are not Latin American.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

Yankistani.

load more comments
view more: next ›