this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
981 points (99.6% liked)

politics

19928 readers
3067 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is the very essence of the difference that should exist between a President and a King. From Federalist 69:

The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law. The person of the king of Great Britain is sacred and inviolable; there is no constitutional tribunal to which he is amenable; no punishment to which he can be subjected without involving the crisis of a national revolution. In this delicate and important circumstance of personal responsibility, the President of Confederated America would stand upon no better ground than a governor of New York, and upon worse ground than the governors of Maryland and Delaware.

The failure of the Republican party to support this kind of check on Presidential power is why we're having this crisis now.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Time to use those guns you've been hoarding. Wasn't that the reason you're even allowed to have them?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

Nah. That was to support the Russian takeover.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

But he said he'd only be a dictator for one day! Are you saying that's not how dictatorships work?!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

"For one day" or "from day one"?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago

He said the first, but meant the second.

[–] [email protected] 159 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the step where the cart goes over the top of the hill, you're not coming back if this starts.

Hard to hear, but if goes forward, this does signal that it's breaking windows time. We all have a Luigi line, start really considering where yours is...

Especially if you're young, and they are doing this before you have been able to establish your own career or a family of your own, the rest of the world needs your strength and energy in these moments. Make no mistake, they are threatening you directly, they want to sell your future for a small profit added to the pile they are hoarding. Decide how hard you want to fight against that

[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Especially if you're older and know that everything you've worked for is at risk. Especially if you're middle aged and your hope of a comfortable old age is being destroyed. Especially if you have family, and know your children's future depends on it.

I know you mean well but fuck ageism, the youth always fight. They don't need a pep talk, older people do.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (5 children)

And then there are the rest of us. Not quite young anymore, but we were robbed of the chance to even have anything to anchor us down. We've been squeezed out of the housing market nearly our entire adult lives. We never could justify having a child, perhaps because of money, perhaps because our consciences wouldn't let us, perhaps because of both. We job-hop every few years already, as it's the only way we've ever received a sizable pay raise.

There is no house, no child, and no job for us to worry about losing. I don't know about y'all, but I've been doing little more than fighting to get by for far too long.

I'm ready to fight for something else.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Is it time to petition the military to intervene?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When I was little, long before I had a reason to want it to be true, I had this theory that the Secret Service, which is obviously not a secret, was called that because they had a secret mandate: If the President ever gets really out of pocket and goes for dictator powers, it's their job to execute him as a traitor.

Anyway, I doubt it's true, but I've been thinking about it a lot lately.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Praetorian Guard killed some emperors, but that isn't an official duty of the Secret Service. Of course, it wasn't an official duty of the Praetorian Guard either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not yet. Trump saying something horrifying while it not being entirely clear he understands what he's actually saying or how anything in government is supposed to work is what we call Monday around here.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't want the military intervening they might decide to run things in a manner efficient for the end user instead of the rich people!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Historically, this is not usually the result of the military taking over a country. Usually the general who did the coup becomes the new rich person, thanks to all the political power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

Well yeah, I'm just making bad jokes over here.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 203 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Oh, shit, so you mean Biden could have just cancelled all that student debt anyway?"

"Well of course not, don't be stupid!"

[–] [email protected] 114 points 1 day ago (14 children)

That's the problem with being on the side of the rule of law: you're constrainted by it, but the side of lawlessness is not.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 day ago (13 children)

So, those 2A people being real fuckin quiet now that an actual tyrant is in play.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

The time to rise would have been when Alabama banned abortion. Even before the kids in cages shit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 16 hours ago

Haven't seen or heard anything from Trump supporters in my area since day 3 of the presidency. Wonder why.... It couldn't be that they have no faces left cause of the leopards... Could it? 🤔

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›