This is the very essence of the difference that should exist between a President and a King. From Federalist 69:

The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law. The person of the king of Great Britain is sacred and inviolable; there is no constitutional tribunal to which he is amenable; no punishment to which he can be subjected without involving the crisis of a national revolution. In this delicate and important circumstance of personal responsibility, the President of Confederated America would stand upon no better ground than a governor of New York, and upon worse ground than the governors of Maryland and Delaware.

The failure of the Republican party to support this kind of check on Presidential power is why we're having this crisis now.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 206 points 2 years ago (15 children)

"Oh, shit, so you mean Biden could have just cancelled all that student debt anyway?"

"Well of course not, don't be stupid!"

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 160 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    This is the step where the cart goes over the top of the hill, you're not coming back if this starts.

    Hard to hear, but if goes forward, this does signal that it's breaking windows time. We all have a Luigi line, start really considering where yours is...

    Especially if you're young, and they are doing this before you have been able to establish your own career or a family of your own, the rest of the world needs your strength and energy in these moments. Make no mistake, they are threatening you directly, they want to sell your future for a small profit added to the pile they are hoarding. Decide how hard you want to fight against that

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 91 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Especially if you're older and know that everything you've worked for is at risk. Especially if you're middle aged and your hope of a comfortable old age is being destroyed. Especially if you have family, and know your children's future depends on it.

    I know you mean well but fuck ageism, the youth always fight. They don't need a pep talk, older people do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    And then there are the rest of us. Not quite young anymore, but we were robbed of the chance to even have anything to anchor us down. We've been squeezed out of the housing market nearly our entire adult lives. We never could justify having a child, perhaps because of money, perhaps because our consciences wouldn't let us, perhaps because of both. We job-hop every few years already, as it's the only way we've ever received a sizable pay raise.

    There is no house, no child, and no job for us to worry about losing. I don't know about y'all, but I've been doing little more than fighting to get by for far too long.

    I'm ready to fight for something else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 101 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    So, those 2A people being real fuckin quiet now that an actual tyrant is in play.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [+] 89 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)
  • [–] 69 points 2 years ago (9 children)
    load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 68 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Time to use those guns you've been hoarding. Wasn't that the reason you're even allowed to have them?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 53 points 2 years ago*

    Fuck these bastards

  • source
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    That fucking Lizard Peter Thiel fucking rebooted when asked about the popular support for Luigi. The mother fucker had not thought about what happens when we the people get tired of their shit and unite against them. They've spent so much time and money dividing us so they can take it all it never occurred that it might backfire.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    That blubbering little weasel. “Y-y-you have to find another way.” I think was the line he used. We tried other ways. Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent revolution inevitable. Luigi showed how to fight back with some effect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Thiel, Yarvin etc., are all so convinced of their own superiority that any actual challenge to their world view/tactics is completely unexpected. They can only comprehend doing violence to people who won't do anything about it. They get their rocks off over child murderers, and state sanctioned violence, but cry when the people they want to step on show and ounce of spine. It's pathetic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago (22 children)

    Is it time to petition the military to intervene?

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    When I was little, long before I had a reason to want it to be true, I had this theory that the Secret Service, which is obviously not a secret, was called that because they had a secret mandate: If the President ever gets really out of pocket and goes for dictator powers, it's their job to execute him as a traitor.

    Anyway, I doubt it's true, but I've been thinking about it a lot lately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 52 points 2 years ago

    Once again, to no-one's surprise. Trump loudly claimed he would do this long ago

    Choose a felon as President, expect him to commit crimes... enjoy

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    "Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal"

    -- Richard Nixon, 1977.

    You've had 47 years to do something about this, to be able to hold your leaders accountable, and apparently it wasn't worth the effort.

    I guess the upside is you won't have to worry about all that wasteful election spending any more. 👍

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 37 points 2 years ago

    lol here it comes.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Groundwork for a coup by the sounds of it. When the next election is supposed to happen I wonder if he'll declare martial law due to some invented issue.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago

    So much for law and order I guess.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    These are unamerican people.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    The gears grind slower each rotation, yet we're still surprised when the machine jams. Constitutional guardrails only work if the drivers pretend they exist—a quaint fiction evaporating under the heat of performative strongman politics. We've seen this before: executive overreach dressed as "emergency," norms crumbling like stale bread.

    What's novel is the brazenness. Courts are now just another PR obstacle, their rulings reduced to content for the outrage algorithm. Linz warned of dueling mandates, not this farce where one branch swallows the rest whole. The Founders' checks? Dry rot under the floorboards, termites long since victorious.

    Democracy cosplay can't hide the scaffolding. When the executive branch treats the judiciary as a nuisance, the only remaining question is how many will still clap as the curtain falls.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (13 children)

    So like, when will other countries start letting us evacuate to them?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Dear Americans, where are your protests?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    And unless someone enforces the rules and consequences for breaking them for the first time in his miserable fucking life, he will be correct.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    RIP US constitution.

    You were a good constitution and worked as a framework for democracies around the world.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 21 points 2 years ago (35 children)
    load more comments (35 replies)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This isn't the failure of the Republican party. This is their victory dance.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The Trump administration is not refusing to share power with an opposing party. It is refusing to follow the constitutional limits of a government that its own party controls completely.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›