this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
407 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19776 readers
3399 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

During a House Oversight Committee hearing, Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) repeatedly shouted an anti-trans slur despite objections from Democratic Rep. Gerald Connolly.

She defended her remarks by attacking transgender rights and dismissing criticism.

The outburst drew condemnation from LGBTQ+ advocates and political figures, highlighting her shift from previously supporting LGBTQ+ rights to embracing anti-trans rhetoric.

Mace has used the slur in past statements and introduced legislation restricting transgender rights.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 170 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

This is a government of the absolute worst people.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

For the absolute worst. The votes were not rigged.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

We're not going to take this lying down

The votes were not rigged, more reason for us to be ready.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I hope she chokes on her vomit in her sleep.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Realistically, I'd be happy for her to choke on pretty much anyone's vomit. Extra points for creativity.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I volunteer. I'll eat some weird shit

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

A whole bag of Skittles please, so she can taste the rainbow

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

The same could work with the right combinations of chili, OJ, corn, peas, blue cacao (or any blue booze), and purple cabbage.

It’s gonna suck a lot more for the vommiter, but she doesn’t deserve to die with a sweet taste in her mouth.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago

You, I like.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 16 hours ago

Bigoted bitch

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

Can’t she, like, shut the fuck up? I wish our paths were to cross.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 16 hours ago

Methinks this Caitlyn Jenner doppelgänger doth protest too much.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 15 hours ago (41 children)

How come the reporting is censoring the word?

[–] [email protected] 86 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Hate speech is censored to avoid normalizing language intended to encourage violence against the disempowered.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Oooh, nicely put.

Before your comment, I was thinking, "why not show the word? What word could it be? I'm a big boy and it won't hurt me," but ... after your comment I think I get it.

I may have to take this away and think on it, and thank you for the catalyst.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 14 hours ago

Fuck yeah. Personal growth for the win.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

Yeah but you could report without reporting the word if that is the case. You could keep the fact “the slur has been used” yet they go the extra mile to put it and censored it it. The reporting should just say the fact that a representative used a discriminatory language. I agree with you that we are on for 4 years of hyper normalization https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/HyperNormalisation

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 hours ago

It's pretty funny. The whole article is about her using a specific slur but it won't even mention what the slur was. Well done good reporting.

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

N. Mace is really focusing on lowering the price of chicken eggs I see.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›