this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
791 points (97.8% liked)

Comic Strips

13531 readers
2681 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 minute ago* (last edited 1 minute ago)

Really not the time to sleep on China if you want to keep your Imperial empire guys.

China completely ravaged US manufacturing and y'all are still in the corner wanking over 'cheap Chinese product.'

China doesn't just make the cheap things you use. They make essentially everything you use.

Stop licking your wounds with petulent little jabs like this and start finding a way to compete. You know, the way your sacred free market dictates that you should.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The right time for Chinese tariffs was 1980.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Not arguing. But why that year specifically?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Ball had started rolling on Reform and Opening Up by about that time

[–] [email protected] 45 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

It's roughly when the US shut down practically all of our manufacturing plants and laid off the vast majority of our manufacturing talent.

We've had some 40 years of mostly not passing down the knowledge of how to manufacture things well.

What manufacturing we still have is pretty amazing, but the demand for cross training - should those jobs return - is going to be way more than the remaining available talent can take on.

Bringing it back in 1980 would have given us a shot to pass on all the skills of the previous generation of skilled tradespeople.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 37 minutes ago

I have watched Chinese tool steel and heat treat ability improve massively over my career. The steel went from chineseium to the cheap usable option in a shop.

Tool and alloy steels are a basic measure of a country's industrial ability. That genie isn't going back in the bottle.

The gutting of US manufacturing and unions has been a crime against blue collar folks that most don't understand. Few new machinists stuck through the recession of the aughts. There are few machinists in my age bracket. There is no magic switch to rebuild manufacturing in the USA. It takes years to create competent machinists and we don't have enough competent machinists to do the training. The apprenticeship programs have mostly been eliminated, the guys that taught me had journeyman's papers but those programs were gone by the time I came up.

I've been lucky enough to grow three machinists, green to competent, in my career. Had to fight with management/corporate to do that much. I know of one that has already left the trade.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Ironically enough, a great solution to this problem would be to bring in Chinese experts to train American workers. The USD still spends.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago

All I can do is mass deportation.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago

I'm approximating, but it's in that general time period when manufacturing was moving to China, and with very little concern for the American worker.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 15 hours ago

The Trump administration is destroying our great nation's thick milfs

[–] [email protected] 19 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Can't afford avocado toast anymore

[–] [email protected] 67 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

If tariffs worked at all like Donnie portrays, to revitalize domestic production and promote local jobs, to help balance a trade deficit, and allow for market choice based on quality more than price, it might be useful.

The reality though is that the American manufacturing and industry space is functionally dead. We've shipped production elsewhere to reduce costs and that's not something that'll get reversed in any short order. All his big talk will do nothing beyond get the additional costs passed onto the buying public while the producers keep laughing all the way to the bank. They'll take any extra taxes gained and put it into the military budget and continue stripping public good services to the bone all while cheering how great we've become. Look at the new carrier group we'll build! So much winning for us both domestically and abroad!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

They'll take any extra taxes gained and put it into the military budget

Trump is actually trying to cut the military budget too. Which is actually problematic because we have a lot of equipment (particularly aircraft) that is aging out and we already can't develop and/or manufacture replacements fast enough

[–] [email protected] 1 points 38 minutes ago

Even if he did, which I really doubt since nobody ever does, I'm pretty sure they could find a way to rearrange some spending in that, what is it 800-900 Billion now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I wonder what Project 2025 has to say about that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

Right? This does nothing without initatives to help people launch manufacturing start-ups

[–] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Here's my uneducated take, with little to no understanding of what's going on in detail:

US public debt is at extraordinary levels. The treasury is hesitant to issue more debt and Donny doesn't want to start his tenure with raising taxes on poor people (that will come in a few months, under the pretense to raise money for war with China or some shit). Therefore, he needs to collect money, whilst appeasing to right nationalists & business. Enter: Tarrifs.

Destroy my armchair take!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 16 hours ago

He’s already planned tax “cuts” that only cut taxes for those making north of $500k/yr. They go up for everyone under that. So we got both!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

At the federal level taxes aren't used to pay debt, they're used to reduce the money supply. That money goes into a shredder, and is functionally unrelated to the money printed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This seems very odd... Can you give me a source on that? Both the shredding of federal tax income and the relation to public expenditure? It appears I have much to learn

[–] [email protected] 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The last time we had a balanced budged was during the Clinton years. Now I was barely out of high school and hardly paid a bit of attention to such matters at the time, but then there was a little event towards the end of 2001 that turned everything upside down. The military and police became supreme concerns and letting The Market™ fix everything was the name of the game under Bush. So much so that we got to experience the 2008 collapse during the Obama years in a major part due to the banks giving loans to people who couldn't pay them on properties that where massively over valued. We've never managed to put things back in order since, in part because the climate got so polarized that 'my team' could NEVER support anything in the least that would be supported by THEM.

Throw in a dash of citizens united completely shifting any sense of public input into politics for anyone not a multi millionaire or more and some populist prattling about the good-ol-days and you get what we have now where a big chunk of people who can't care to think for a moment of the actual policies being proposed beyond which team put it forth and you have a lovely recipe for an open pillaging by those with the power to do so.

Yeah, part of me wants to just shut off the news for the next several years, but unfortunately being prepared requires being aware...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

True, but I don't think anyone expects a balanced US budget at this stage of global economics. IMO a loss of the AAA rating would tank the economy significantly and risk a massive corporate backlash. This will make the government's stance untenable and cannot simply be solved by issuing unlimited debt.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

The next four years will be fascinating to watch.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 18 hours ago (15 children)

are you watching from outside or inside? i got the feeling one is less stressful than the other

[–] [email protected] 2 points 28 minutes ago

For someone with family ties in Ukraine, being on the outside is still incredibly terrifying. Let alone that Muskfuck is now promoting AFD

[–] [email protected] 73 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

When America gets sick, the whole world coughs.

Sadly we're all in the inside of this one

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago

I’m gonna guess this might be different 4 years from now. I would think it’s in the best interest of other countries to lessen their dependence on the USA for certain things.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 16 hours ago

Sometimes you have to cut out the cancer and then let it heal.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 17 hours ago

From the outside I’m mostly concerned about the future of the NATO alliance. Trump threatening to annex NATO allies wasn’t on my bingo card.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 18 hours ago

It's stressful enough from the outside 😰

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

This comic misses the incentive for local businesses to chase the new profit margin created by the tariff.

If your competition is import goods, you may sell a quality product at $2, with the import version at $1.50. If the tariff causes the import to rise to $2.50, then the local capitalist will raise to $2.40. There’s no reason not to take the extra profit made from a selfish perspective.

Alternatively, the importer could leave the market. But now you have a monopoly, which again, is anti-competitive and leads to raised prices and malicious practices without consumer protections, which the administration seems to be firing.

These are great moves for capital owners to reshape and control market. Consumers will suffer.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

This implies that local availability of competitive products exists, which for the vast majority of things in the US is not the case. So many of our goods are made overseas and imported.

Tariffs are going to raise consumer expenses till one of two things happens: Local production ramps up and provides local goods (at likely a similar or higher price because our wages are higher than overseas) or a political change occurs that results in the removal of the tariffs. Either way US consumers are going to feel the increased cost of goods for the foreseeable future...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 12 minutes ago)

And meanwhile many small businesses will go down since they don't have the bargaining power like their bigger competitors. The rising prices of their suppliers will completely wipe out the tiny margins they had. Even if they raise their prices their competitors can undercut them even more aggressively now. Also quality and quantities of products will go down.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago

Hypothetically this could create business incentives for building local capacity, but realistically manufacturers are not going to invest with the assumption that these tariffs will be permanent. Eventually either Trump will back down or he'll be replaced by someone else, and the tariffs will end. Why invest in manufacturing when there's no long term guarantees for profitability?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

Agreed that the typical, more realistic case is what will happen.

I’ve gotten into arguments with other keyboard warriors over this point, so it’s something I mention when tariffs are discussed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

"Junk" lolol, the computer in your pocket? Or the drones capable of turning the tide in a war? 🤔

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That stuff was never cheap though

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

They are cheap compared to what they would cost if they were made on US Soil by Americans

load more comments
view more: next ›