this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
321 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

2146 readers
455 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum wrote a letter asking Google to reject the U.S. decision to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America on its mapping service.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Google is pretty well known for displaying certain 'contested' things with different names in different countries.

It will change only for those viewing from the US I believe, not the rest of the world.

That this should even be 'contested' is a joke, but Google views this Trump-pandering as the price of their seat at the top table for this new administration, and they're quite happy to do it.

If we have to rename it, my vote is for the "Gulf of CUM" (Cuba, USA and Mexico)

That's fair isnt it? πŸ’¦

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As a US citizen I want it left as the Gulf of Mexico.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'd be down for gulf of cum

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While we're renaming things can we also rename NAFTA to CUMFTA

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No no, we're still talking about the map.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So then in 4 years if a dem gets elected everything gets changed back... then a few years later if a rep gets elected...flipflop forever?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Reread what you replied to. He wants it to be called the same thing it has always been called and what the rest of the world calls it. No president should be able to arbitrarily rename shit every 4 years. It dissolves the utility of giving things names.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I agree and it wasn't a reply, just a thought that it could technically flip back and forth...ridiculously. which is very sad. It will always be gulf of Mexico and denali to me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Do you still think there will be an election in four years?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Well hopefully there won't be a trump in four years.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

There will be concepts of an election. Just like in Russia.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

It sounds like their is only one English language version of Maps, so Canada, UK, etc. will also change.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 month ago

The dumbest timeline...again.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Huh, I’m in the US and noticed it’s still the Gulf of Mexico.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

It's not official until the Government enters it into the Geographic Names Information System. Once that happens Google will begin changing their maps.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

They are likely waiting for the cartographers to finish their jobs.... Unless they were asked to resign... Who knows how this government functions at this point.

Waiting for the presidential cars to be replaced with cyber trucks.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why did the name get changed? U.S.A. needed another ego stroke? Our public perception of nonstop ego-masturbation slowing down?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The usual white nationalism bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

aka the usual Trump bullshit..

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Reminds me of when I posted "Trump's white nationalist America" to a place right wingers frequent. They freaked out pretty hard. Gee, I wonder why.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

He's mad all right.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Other documents that mention "the gulf of Mexico" will become unenforceable.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I think the plan is if your in the US the name will change. I think. Something about USA being classified as a sensitive nation when before names didn't hurt us.

Backbone lost.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It is fucking freedom fries all over again.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

It will always be the Gulf of Mexico to me

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Being run by snowflakes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Ahhh yes. The United States. A sensitive nation of white nationalist snowflakes. It's honestly on brand.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The people with the authority to officially change the name in the U.S. did so. The opportunity to do something about it was 3 months ago when only about a third of eligible voters voted against this crap. So here we are, and it is only going to get worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

There is still reason to pressure Google in the US (based on this policy of theirs) and especially abroad (as they plan to use both names outside USA and Mexico). Otherwise, they are handing Trump an easy win.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm legitimately saddened by the fact this even needs to happen because of this moronic cretin.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm more worried about Elon ruining around in the treasury department at the moment.

Whatever they call the golf for the next 4 years is just whatever they call it for the next 4 years.

Google does a lot of geolocation dependent map drawing where borders are shown for one location and one country and in another location in another country

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

With all the illegal shit they are already doing and are going to do I personally don't think there will be another election and if there is it will be like those in russia where the opposition gets imprisoned, released after the election and eventually murdered.

The gulf is renamed by fuckwits. Who says we have to use it. I refuse to call it anything but the Gulf of Mexico.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I personally don’t think there will be another election

I give it 60:40 there will have to be a coup to get him out this time.

dear lord, I hope we have it in us.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

According to Google:

When our policy says that we display the "primary, common, local" names for a body of water, each of those three adjectives has an important and distinct meaning. By saying "primary", we aim to include names of dominant use, rather than having to add every conceivable local nickname or variation. By saying "common", we mean to include names which are in widespread daily use, rather than giving immediate recognition to any arbitrary governmental re-naming. In other words, if a ruler announced that henceforth the Pacific Ocean would be named after her mother, we would not add that placemark unless and until the name came into common usage. Finally, by saying "local", we aim to reflect the primary and common names used by countries that actually border the body of water, as they are the countries recognized under international law as having a special sovereign stake in it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

So far I've got MapQuest and something called Maps.ME ready to replace Google.