this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
67 points (94.7% liked)

News

24232 readers
4221 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

I'm confused because Snopes is saying they're now saying staffing was in control? Wondering who got pressured to change their report.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Trump will use this event to claim a new need for privatizing ATC.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

or calling them dei hires or saying they came from foreign mental institutions

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Right after mollusk forced out the FAA chief too 🧐

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago

Not only that, Delta Air spent $3.8 million to lobby for more slots. United, Alaska, and American Airlines objected because experts have been arguing for years that Reagan is dangerously overcrowded and had been experiencing near-misses.

Anyway, Delta got what they wanted and just last month the airport started allowing more flights.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 hours ago

“Both pilots had flown this specific route before, at night. This wasn’t something new to either one of them,” said Jonathan Koziol, chief of staff for Army aviation. “Even the crew chief in the back has been in the unit for a very long time, very familiar with the area, very familiar with the routing structure.”

They’re saying that to imply that therefor they’re not at fault, but if anything routine makes you more likely to make mistakes. I’m sure the staffing problems didn’t help either. I guess we’ll see when the report comes out, if the black boxes survived.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

Site seems to be down or getting the thing of death. Does someone have a mirror?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

The data shows the helicopter well above the maximum altitude - 350 feet instead of 200. I don’t think the staffing was the problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 24 minutes ago

Another pair of eyes might have caught it and called out "hey fuckass, this helo is getting too close, go around". One person managing too much means they miss things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 22 minutes ago)

That may well be one thing that's wrong, but I'm going to guess that normally, one still wouldn't have a regional jet flying directly over a helicopter with just 150 feet of vertical separation.

EDIT: I was waiting to see if VASAviation -- a YouTube channel that puts up ATC radio recordings -- would put up logs for this one. Looks like they have; three separate videos.

EDIT2: Might be more analysis going on on news or aviation sites, but as per the recordings, the helicopter was notified about the plane, said that they had the plane in sight and had requested and was granted clearance for visual separation with it. My understanding is that that places some level of responsibility on the pilot:

https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/atc_html/chap7_section_2.html

Pilot-applied visual separation.

Maintain communication with at least one of the aircraft involved and ensure there is an ability to communicate with the other aircraft.
The pilot sees another aircraft and is instructed to maintain visual separation from the aircraft as follows:

Tell the pilot about the other aircraft. Include position, direction, type, and, unless it is obvious, the other aircraft's intention.
Obtain acknowledgment from the pilot that the other aircraft is in sight.
Instruct the pilot to maintain visual separation from that aircraft.

If the pilot reports the traffic in sight and will maintain visual separation from it (the pilot must state both), the controller may “approve” the operation instead of restating the instructions.

If aircraft are on converging courses, inform the other aircraft of the traffic and that visual separation is being applied.

I don't think that the above happened in the recording.

Advise the pilots if the targets appear likely to merge.

I don't think that that happened (at least, not explicitly, though there were multiple transmissions to the helicopter about the plane; I don't know if there's specific terminology that has to be used).