this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
23 points (92.6% liked)

History

855 readers
6 users here now

Welcome to c/History @ Mander.xyz!



Notice Board



Work in progress...

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.


Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not exactly a good comparison since the trial of Jesus is not well documented. There are many rumors and second-hand accounts but no original documents.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

some people can get rattled by this, but there most likely never was a historical jesus figure; there may have been, but it's wildly unlikely, for soo many reasons - and there's nowhere near enough evidence to say the character definitely existed, not even close.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

There's nowhere enough evidence to say he definitely existed but the scholarly consensus is that he most likely did.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The ladder half of that headline made the former pretty worthless.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah the trial of a Folk Tale doesn’t have that much weight in reality-…

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

So the document had been classified as written in Nabataean, but it's unclear if that turned out not to be the case in the end?