I'm countering with this from my home country of Belgium

post
Welp, I ended up searching for it so here is a link. https://interestingengineering.com/culture/the-netherlands-unique-water-bridge
I thought it could have something to do with the levels of water but apparently it was cheaper than a bridge.
But it is a bridge
i too subscribe to Practical Engineering
If the bridge falls, how far does the flooding spread? Is the river going to be dammed by the gap?
Not critical, just curious how the engineers accounted for this.
You know what's better? It's not a river. It's more like an artificial lake created by cutting off the North Sea.
I believe it's what is known as a "tunnel."
It's not just a tunnel, it's a water bridge
I N F R A S T R U C T U R E
Aquaducts aren't new. Granted this is a novel design, but it's still just an aquaduct. https://waterways.org.uk/about-us/news/canal-aqueducts
It's called an aquaduct and was invented by the Romans. But yeah.
Isn't an aqueduct the other way round?
Like transporting water from a natural river, and not building a water bridge of an existing river over a road?
Honest question, because I only associated it with providing water for cities and not to provide boats with pathways.
But yeah. Petty condescending comment, and you're not even right.
It's a tunnel. It's just shorter than most.
all 46 comments