top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 130 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

Well you're conveniently forgetting that Obama had the fucking audacity to eat dijon mustard wear a tan suit be black.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 81 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Honestly, the current situation is beyond double standards. The Republicans have free reign to more or less break any of their own rules and suffer almost no consequences. Meanwhile, literally anything a Democrat does is spun into multiple mutually exclusive conspiracy theories that their base and the media somehow manage to spout simultaneously.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 70 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Big Antichrist vibes. Would it have burned his hand? I guess will never know.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I think we can safely assume it would have. Why else wouldn't he want to touch Jesus Book?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Sadly I think it would have been more than half. Personally I'd like less of the Bible in any of our swear ins, but Orange Hitler not doing it just keeps the process rolling forward.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Whoever succeeds trump, (assuming that happens, and it's not Vance), should do the same thing, so we can maybe get rid of that dumbass tradition.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago*

    If one of Obama's friends would've done a nazi salute behind the presidential seal, the Republicans would've lynched Obama on the lawn of the white house

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago

    He actually did take the oath without putting his hand on a bible and they did try to make a big deal about it.

    John Roberts messed up the oath during the inauguration and they had to redo it later.

    During the do-over there was no bible: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_inauguration_of_Barack_Obama

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    He was probably afraid of getting struck by divine lightning or something like that if he touched a Bible while uttering the words with no intentions to follow them.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    Not to be annoying but it is in fact your business

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    As if they actually cared about such matters. It would have only been just another excuse to stoke moral panic and outrage as red meat for their rabid base.

    It’s exactly the sort of cynicism that, by design and intent, leads to apathy and fascism

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Did the orange turd or someone else do that?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (11 children)

    It is absolutely not a requirement to swear an oath on a bible, or even to have a bible nearby.

    It just happens to be a longstanding custom in the USA. Many politicians take the oath on a bible just for the optics. DT, of all people, is all about optics. Dude probably wasn’t paying any attention, and surely winging his swearing given the last minute changes.

    In any case, shouldn't everyone be applauding a president for refusing to touch a bible, tacitly denouncing religious contexts near government?

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    Except when Trump was asked what his favorite book of all time was, can you guess what he answered?

    That's right. He said The Bible was his favorite book. You do understand the difference between actually believing in something, or just being a hypocrite and a con-man, right?

    It's not about whether it's a requirement or not. It's about a con artist revealing the con, and watching people like you handwave it away.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    This is just the childish act of crossing your fingers when you make a promise. He didn't put his hand on the Bible because he isn't planning on presiding faithfully, and he has absolutely no intention whatsoever to preserve, protect or defend the Constitution of the United States unless it benefits him personally at the time.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    It's the ceremony organizers' fault for neglecting to bring a bible small enough to put his hand on.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›