this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2025
32 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3189 readers
59 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This quote is a good summary of the article:

It is time to rebuild meaningful working and trading relations with Europe. This does not have to mean rejoining the EU. But it does mean recognising where our security and our prosperity both lie.

Thoughts?

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

uk spending more money on defense is just grifting by contractors, uk is not assailable and surrounded by allies, but i'm sure more sas war criminals are always needed for guardian of israel to murder some people somewhere. Also money laundering gone to uae, so that seems meh for the financial services economy (10% of gdp, no?).

Aligning to eu makes sense in any case

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

In the other, the Liberal Democrat leader, Sir Ed Davey, called for Britain to join the customs union by 2030 as part of a larger deal with Europe.

Would the EU actually accept us joining the EUCU without joining the EEA?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Absolutely not. Most EU countries are still sour about the cherry picking Brits back in the day and the entire Brexit charade.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Turkey is in the customs union without being in the EEA right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Thoughts?

Labour isn't willing to lose 30-40% of it's voters. Cold hard truth. Thus they will never countenance rejoin on any level.

Closer "defence" arrangements is as far as they will go.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're probably right. Things like joining the customs union probably won't happen until at least the next government in 2029.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Th best scenario as I see it is that the UK pays for membership to all the E* bodies that it would have had membership to when in the union. Stuff like the science projects or standards agencies and the like. Eventually someone might say, hang about why are we paying for all this when we could get this and more via some membership?

But that's not going to one parliament away. The UK will be outside for at least 20 years. At least. Unless we stop voting Labour and Tory. But that isn't going to happen. 30 years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I don't care about 'threats' from Russia or China, nothing more than new Red Scare propaganda. So, that point can be thrown in the ~~trash~~ rubbish bin.

Joining the customs union would boost trade by eliminating most taxes on imports and exports with EU member states. It would place Britain behind a European tariff wall with the rest of the world. It would help to align rules which, as Sir Ed pointed out, mean that a UK air cargo company currently has to service its planes in the US rather than in Europe. And it would reduce some of the red tape created by Britain’s own post-Brexit regulations.

What will EU even import from the UK? Does it even want British goods? Is there even enough demand backed by purchasing power in the EU countries given their own economic stagnation? Relying on exports as a source of demand is a terrible idea, especially when the Government isn't willing to step in if and when there are any shocks.

The economic reasons are more valid, I think more open trade between EU and UK would be good. But it's not going to fix U.K's problems in any way, that requires Government to do stuff and increase spending, which it isn't going to do.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I guess the invasion of Ukraine didn't happen. It's just a "propaganda" myth isn't it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

UK and Ukraine does sound the same, yeah.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The UK has had its own attacks from the Russian state (the assassination of Alexander Litvinenko and the attempted assassination of Sergei Skripal). Given that they invaded Ukraine (despite denying that they would), who knows what they will do next.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

India assassinated someone in Canada, is India going to occupy Canada soon? UK and Russia are both nuclear states btw.

U.K. is subservient to U.S., has been since WW2, and likely will be as long as the U.S. exists . The article specifically mentions Russia but only links to another article saying Trump 'wants' Greenland. Mentioning Russia and China is a great way to ignore the real puppeteer.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

I think there is probably less of a chance of the US being malicious towards the UK (e.g. sending assassins to murder Brits), compared to the risk coming from Putin's regime.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

the continent cries out for bovril