all 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 111 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 75 points 2 years ago (4 children)
    try {
        operation();
    } catch {
        // nice weather, eh?
    }
    
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Starting with Java 21 (I think), they've introduced ignored variables, so you can now actually do this:

    try {
        operation();
    } catch (Exception _) {
        // nice weather, eh?
    }
    

    Edit: forgot that this is about JS lel

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    If your joking yes, if your not Java and Java Script are seperate things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Actually made this mistake in front of 20 people the other day. Guy at my job mentioned coding in java and I asked if he was doing web dev 🤦

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Plenty of java back end web development, so maybe not as embarrassing as you felt?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    He said "I've been closing in C# and Java for 2 years" and I asked, in front of everyone, "are you doing web dev?" And he just coldly said no

    See this could have been fine if I didn't double down and go "then what are you using java for... OH WAIT"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    On Error Resume Next

    Visual Basic is a beautiful language

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    I legitimately use this line in one of my scripts because range.find returns an error of the value is not found. The use case is taking a 2d matrix saved as an array, with data collected from multiple excel tabs and rearranging it for a CSV upload into Salesforce. The initial array contains values that the rest of the data does not have, so when I search for a non existent value, I can skip the error.

    Of course vba COULD just implement try/catch statements and that'd be so much cleaner, but alas.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 65 points 2 years ago

    If I can't see it, is it really there?

  • source
  • [–] 59 points 2 years ago
    [–] 57 points 2 years ago

    If it wanted to get my attention it should have been an error

  • source
  • [–] 49 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago

    Warnings are for ignorings :3

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Eh it's Javascript. Anything goes

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Warnings? We’ll come back and address those later. Maybe once we’re feature complete. Or maybe shortly after that.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Meanwhile in another universe one of my biggest win was to introduce this line in our PR validation pipeline.

    eslint . --max-warnings 0
    
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    In a codebase with a lot of warnings is even better for me to add a disable comments for all the existing warning and then not allow any new one in.

    And then each time a part of the code needs to be touched the existing warning there should be solved too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Actually fixing warnings is for noobs

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I, too, place 2> /dev/null after every line

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Yes, but 2>&1 > /dev/null is the real hero.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    No, > /dev/null 2>&1 is. If try your example but with file instead null, stderr content not in file.

    Because x>y not redirect x to y, but duplicate y and set x to y-duplicate. See bash manpage REDIRECTION (your example in that section for what not work).

    As i understand, your example set 2 to what 1 is, then set 1 to null. Now 2 not null, but what 1 before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    edit: works better when used together with StackOverflow.comment.enabled = false;

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    -ErrorActionPreference SilentlyContinue

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I don't get it. This isn't funny. I wouldn't approve it in merge request. Most wouldn't.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Trying to hide problems and incompetence is the joke. A lot of people don't want problems solved, they just don't want to see them, and will take the easy route. If you just want that, this is the easy route.

    Incompetent? Absolutely, that's the joke.

  • source
  • parent