top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 217 points 2 years ago (15 children)

Weird how we have to pay more money every single year, and insurance somehow provides us less and less for our greater and greater spend

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 101 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Or, with car insurance, you get punished for actually using the service you pay for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    A service you are legally required to pay for, no less.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Isn't the required car insurance the part that covers the OTHER cars, property and people you might harm with your car?

    I don't think it's required that you carry enough insurance to be able to replace your own car. Might depend on your state, though?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    It is actually kinda incredible. I remember seeing a comic in Mad Magazine back in the 90s that satirized insurance companies by cutting 'expensive' healthcare and the cartoon showed an emaciated patient on IV and the insurance guy about to cut the tube with scissors.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 112 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    I have a friend who has a prosthetic. Sure they could live their life in a wheelchair. But this guy goes hiking, and acts like a fully capable walking person. The quality of life is huge. It really gives back their life.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] [S] 78 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Yep. It’s absolutely insane they wouldn’t cover it.

    It’s honestly unethical as shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 2 years ago* (5 children)

    Unethical and counterproductive. Having a prosthetic limb would almost invariably lead to a less sedentary lifestyle, which is strongly correlated with better health. Paying for a prosthetic today has to be cheaper than paying for a heart attack or diabeties later.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    You're making the assumption that they'll pay out for a heart attack or diabetes later. You just said that they were caused by the pre-existing condition of not having a prosthetic limb.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They are saying it’s not “medically necessary” to have any quality of life. As long as you’re breathing, you’re A-okay in their book.

    This is what insurance in the US has come to mean.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    Like how they still consider dental care to be "cosmetic." They'll rip them out of your head free of charge, but putting new ones in? No sir... You can eat mush!

    But God forbid anyone mentions a solution that includes socialized healthcare...

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 86 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Noooo heckin' killing CEOs is violent and bad

    Then this fucking headline pops up.

    They're basically crippling people, who could have at least some kind of limb use, by denying them limbs that THEY ALREADY PAID FOR AS PART OF INSURANCE PAYMENTS.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 2 years ago
    [–] 63 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    This just feeds into my disillusionment with science and technology. What is the point of having developed these incredible things to then not go and use them. I just have to spell it out now. What. The. Fuck. You know I was born into a modern age but looks like im going to die in the dark ages.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    It’s not a Sci/Tech issue.

    It’s a dystopian capitalism issue. When products that don’t have adequate profit margin and volume to make notable contributions to the bottom line, or worse yet, negativley affect the bottom line in a high per-unit cost, they are a liability. Profits direct research, too, unfortunately.

    Humanity, quality of life, and all that medical shit is secondary or even further down the priority list for the corporations thinking about their profits first and the “service” last.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 51 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I wonder if someone cut off the CEO's limbs, would the medical necessity of prosthetic limbs would be questioned?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [+] 42 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago

    Wow. This means that now, someone can say that medical bills literally cost them an arm & a leg.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Tbh I was expecting the first comment to contain the name Luigi...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 34 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Lemmy Netizens Consider Offing Another Healthcare CEO, Questioning Their Industry Necessity - Fediverse News Network
    ^*not^ ^an^ ^actual^ ^news^ ^network.^ ^Yet.^

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 2 years ago
    [–] 33 points 2 years ago

    Someone needs to play super Mario bros again.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago

    "I mean technically any medical service is not truly medically necessary, right? You could just die*"

    *Funeral services are not covered under your current plan.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago

    Someone needs some adjusting.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Why are US citzens not founding a health care co-op? Are there even viable solutions left over there?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Denied: Can't you just lie there like a broken Crash Test Dummy until you stop being a burden?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 28 points 2 years ago

    Burn it all to the ground

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Okay, I can spell out the "medical necessity" for you insurance companies in a way you'll understand: mental health is important for physical health. You do things to improve mental health and you also improve physical health. So if you improve someone's mental health now, you won't be paying out for all of the later physical problems brought on by the stress and the knowledge that their life would be better if only some more miserly than Scrooge insurance company would let them have a fucking leg.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And having a prosthetic limb is important for physical health anyways. Helps you be more active, massively increases productivity (that’s what capitalists want right?), decreases wheelchair/caregiver costs, etc.

    It’s simply an all around win.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Insurance companies push obvious lies to intentionally defraud the public. That's their entire business model. That's why your doctor had to fight through dozens of automatic rejections sent by the insurance company, they fully intend to lie in order to avoid making payments they agreed too when signing you up for insurance. A just society would be putting these people in federal prisons.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That doesn't seem like a smart response to one of you getting assassinated.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    For idiots who would like the UK to adopt American system instead:

    "NHS covers the cost of prosthetic limbs for those who need them. In the UK, there are around 55,000 to 60,000 patients who require prosthetic limbs due to amputation or congenital limb deficiencies, and NHS England allocates about £60 million annually for these services."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    You can make a perfectly serviceable peg leg with an old broom handle. Ask your insurance company for a free how-to brochure!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    You think a CEO has ever been beaten near death with a broken prosthetic limb? Just asking maybe that's a thing.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    I think it's about time for an organized mass murder of all healthcare ceos.... Maybe then they'll learn? Or do we need to go after the shareholders too? What will it take? How can we make them quiver in their boots half as much as they fucked us out of paychecks only to tell us to get bent when we request the care we've paid for?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›