this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
254 points (100.0% liked)

news

23417 readers
605 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"It is a complicated issue. It is truly a complicated issue, with a wide range of views, truly a wide range of views," Jean-Pierre said. "There is no 'yes or no' answer to this, it is complicated. There is a rule that the Department of Education [DOE] has put forward, and we're going to let that process move forward, and again, we want to make sure that while we establish guardrails with this rule, we also prevent discrimination, as well, against transgender kids. But again, a complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that."

"Absolutely no reason for the Biden admin to do this," New York Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wrote. "It is indefensible and embarrassing. The admin can still walk this back, and they should. It's a disgrace."

"Honestly, this move by Biden to push a rule on trans kids in sports is not only a backwards betrayal, it [forces] us to have to spend our time dealing with god d*** sports instead of criminal bans on our healthcare," Alejandra Caraballo, a civil rights attorney and LGBTQ+ advocate, wrote. "He could have just done nothing. This is legitimizing transphobia."

The mOsT PrOgReSsIvE Administration in History™ funny-clown-hammer "A complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that" funny-clown-hammer Fuck off out of here with that "centrist" nonsense. There's nothing complicated about it, and it's not an issue unless you want to turn it into one and want to appeal to people's emotions like Republicans are doing. It was only a matter of time before they'd start throwing trans people under the bus. I guess with the coming elections it's as good a time as ever.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 208 points 1 year ago (18 children)

Just in case anyone from other instances are stopping by, this is how liberal democracy leads to fascism. You have a right wing party that wants to criminalize being trans while tacitly supporting physical violence and extermination. The only viable opposition party can't even use decisive language about the validity and existence of trans people among cis people. Because it might hurt their polling.

Now the strongest, political position from the "left" is "it's complicated." So when the right starts being very clear about violence and carrying it out through official state entities, the new left position will be even more to the right. Because they already gave up on "Trans people should participate in the things cis people do." So it's not even about trans people living a normal life. Historically, by the time we get there, it doesn't matter what the left position is anymore. Because the right has taken over and are putting people in camps.

This is why it's so very annoying to hear about harm reduction and voting the lesser evil. That's not how it works. One hand washes the other. The lesser evil just leads to greater evil getting strong anyways. It doesn't stop it or bide you time. The only lesser evil is violent revolution, which is only evil if you don't understand what's at stake here.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 140 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Kids can be up to a year older than their classmates due to the way kindergarten start date cutoffs work. These kids who arbitrarily end up older tend to outperform their peers, because a 7.9 year old is stronger and faster than a 7 year old. This is a real difference - the NHL did a study on this and found that their players disproportionately have early-year birthdays due to how this effect lines up with hockey camps.

Do you care? Of course not, nobody cares about the competitive fairness of kids' sports, the point is just to get them to exercise and have a hobby. We can verify that nobody takes this seriously by looking at high school sports, where suddenly a four year age gap is acceptable.

Okay, so why does this suddenly matter when it's what team a trans kid should be on?

[–] [email protected] 129 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Trans people matter, sports don't.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Americans lose their minds if you put peoples lives over their treats

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wholeheartedly agree, I have yet to see this take in person

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (8 children)

What stands out to me is that the people worrying the most about trans people in womens' sports are the same ones who were making fun of womens' sports specifically right up until they realized they could use it to attack trans people.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 116 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I remember reading that when Utah did their ban on trans athletes in school sports, there was exactly one trans girl playing in a girls' sport in the whole state. Exactly one. Statewide legislature passing laws focused on one person, a child.

All this scrutiny and transphobia is directed at literal children, many of whom might be the only trans athlete out of millions. Transphobia is such a disgusting thing to me, not only because of the chauvinism and bigotry, but because it's just so senseless. Trans people are already rare enough as it is and also one of the most vulnerable populations in regards to poverty, assault, unemployment, etc. I've seen some statistics saying that only around 1,000 people in America initiate HRT per year. That should give an idea of just how rare and vulnerable trans people are. And now there's a senseless cultural panic just to whip up a few more eyeballs on the spectacle?

Death to America

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago

Statewide legislature passing laws focused on one person, a child.

Imagine all the hours spent. Utah has 104 legislators between their house and senate. If the bill was discussed on the floor for 10 minutes in each chamber, that’s 17 hours of human effort wasted. Now add in hours of deliberation in committee. Hours put in by staffers, by experts, by consultants, by lobbyists. That’s hundreds, if not over a thousand, hours spent on a ruining a JV sport for a single trans girl. What a ridiculous and disgusting waste.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 108 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Gotta love all the liberals coming in here telling us why it's "complicated", while pointing out they support trans right. No, you don't support trans rights. Because if you did, you wouldn't undermine those rights by parroting the same talking points as conservatives; talking points that are based on willfully ignoring facts, and even the lack of evidence that this is an issue that exists in the first place. It also gets tiring seeing those same people act like they know how trans people's bodies work, and not even acknowledge the fact that trans people go through biological changes if they can get gender affirming care, and are very comparable to their cis counterparts. The medical science on it is right there, and trans people's own experiences are living proof as well. But it's easier forming bullshit "opinions" instead, especially if you have a certain agenda (conservatives), or just don't care about said minority as much as you think you do.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they're unscratched liberals! You won't like them when they're scratched! scared-fash

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago

Punch a fascist, and a liberal gives you a lecture on civility and violence, while downplaying civilian casualties of US drone strikes. maybe-later-honey

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's really not complicated. If trans people are the athletic super soldiers they're made out to be we need to encourage them to compete in sports to make them less of a snooze-fest.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 year ago (81 children)

adding this to the long list of reasons im not voting for biden again when libs ask. my go-to is always “that fucker still owes me $600!”

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago

Joe Biden owes me $600 and I don't even fuckin live there

load more comments (80 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But again, a complicated issue with a wide range of views, and we respect that.

You don't have to though.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago (20 children)

In fact there should be no respect for the views of bigots

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Okay, so democrats may not be harm reduction, but they'll... checks notes ...look the other way as others cause harm?

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago

Ah the abortion playbook

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

Oh nice this is on /all/ now. I'd just like to say that anyone that supports democrats after this deserves to be hit by a truck. That is all.

Eat shit, I genuinely hope physical harm comes to you.

On a tangential note, arm lgbt people.

amerikkka trans-gun

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It is a complicated issue tho. Some transphobes deserve re-education camps, while others need to get the wall.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago

In LIB speak calling something "complicated" is just an excuse to take the reactionary position

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

bridget-pride-stay-mad

Give them no quarter, hexbears and lemmygrads

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

The issue of whether or not Joe Biden should be beaten to death with a rusty shovel is 'complicated'

There is no 'yes or no' answer to this, it is complicated - maybe he should just be shot, or have an anvil dropped on his head instead

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Clearly we need to ban all sports until we can figure out and resolve what the fuck is wrong with Americans.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"A lot of people think." , says Biden admin after kidnapping hundreds of kids, sending them to work factory farms

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago

john-brown I GrumpigPoopBalls am now quite certain that the crimes of this guilty land will never be purged away but with blood

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

It’s not complicated. The Biden administration wants the support of both those who see trans people as deserving the same rights as cis people and those who would like to see trans people excluded from society.

What is complicated is that the Biden administration wants the support not of me or you if we fall into one of those groups, but the support of both the national and regional bourgeoisie who do so.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago

As a trans person, fuck sports, fuck the biden admin, I'm so fucking sick of this shit stfu-terf

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Besides what everyone else is saying in defense of trans rights which are human rights, I want to add a tangential point. I wouldn't ever want my elected representative to think an issue is complicated. I sent you to the executive branch to exercise power on my behalf. Not to exercise fairness, not to exercise @[email protected] . No, motherfucker, we WON, fucking act like it. I don't need the issue explained to me, you're not a salesman. You don't propose shit; I do. If you're the one for the job, I vote for you. You are my public servant. I don't know what drivel they taught you for that bullshit law degree, but it's clouded you to the reality that your will, desire, and vision for the country as an elected official is secondary to mine. The issue is not complicated as far as you're concerned; we'll tell you what the answer is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›