183
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 43 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't care about bishops, a triple fork is always a good move, no matter what

Edit: I meant to say quadruple fork #pawnawarenessmonth

[-] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago

In that case it's quintuple fork, cause 2 pawns are threatened.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Never move your horsey to the edge, that's why I didn't count the left pawn but in a very literal sense, you are right

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

Excluding moves just because they are not very good goes completely against the spirit of this post.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I don't believe in ghosts or spirits or fairytales

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Except when you set yourself up for mate in 2 or so.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Well I mean looking at the play, other player is in check and has to defend the king. Depending on the response, it could take out the queen. Overall, the player is already in a really shit position. Taking a chance could backfire or help come back from the brink

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Sub 1k yeah I could see the gamble paying off, but beyond that? The moves at the bottom of the pic tell the tale- Bishop to c5 takes knight, pawn to d4 blocks a check, likely bishop to d4 confirms the mate. Even aside from that, its something like a 13 point material advantage, along with white having a locked up rook. Even without the blunder that's a rough situation.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Mate in 1 maybe but that's where I draw the line

[-] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago

Damn! This should he brilliant move! Usa-British gambit, your opponent loses queen you lose 2 towers!

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Taking the rook might delay mate a move or two, and blocks check with the bishop. Unless there is a mate right after that I missed.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

bishop can capture knight next turn which is checkmate I think

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Takes one more turn. Pawn D4.

Bishop then takes that pawn for checkmate though, unless I'm missing something.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

It is so Anarchy that Black just flat left their King in check.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Black to move. Bishop takes knight. Checkmate. What am I missing here?

E: oh it was white to move. The triple fork doesn’t matter. White should move the rook across to below the bishop.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Sorry I don’t get the UI. Did white just move the knight? Or is it whites move?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

White just moved the knight, black to play

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Well yeah, that’s mate in one.

I’m wondering why white would move the knight like that for the triple fork. I was thinking white would move the rook. Still white is in bad shape here.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's not mate in one, it's mate in two. White can block the bishop with the D pawn.

Kc5+ - Bxc5+
d4 - Bxd4#

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Oh yes, of course. You are right. The pawn buys one extra move.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

So mate in two. Not in one.

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
183 points (97.9% liked)

AnarchyChess

5766 readers
293 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
[email protected]
[email protected]

Matrix space

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS