558
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 135 points 1 year ago

I think a lot of rich people don't understand that being rich precludes them from being a part of the working class. They think that because they're working, that must mean they're a working class person. And then that leads to shit like this, rich folk calling other rich folk working-class.

Obviously, there are more reasons for people calling the CEO a working class hero, but I think what I said is still one of those reasons.

[-] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

Yeah the "hero" part doesn't equal "I made it big therefore I'm a hero"

A real working class hero is a person who did make it big and gave back to the ones beneath them.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

On 9/11, Steve Buscemi, formerly a firefighter, son of a garbage man and a hotel worker, decided to don his old uniform and go back to his old station and help the rescue crews with no regard to his own safety. He worked 12-hour days taking living people and corpses (including the bodies of other firefighters) out of the rubble and did not bother doing anything like letting the press know about his selfless act. In fact, he said nothing about it. A firefighter posted on Facebook to thank him and that's how the world found out.

That is a working-class hero.

Brian Thompson was personally responsible for causing far more deaths than what happened on 9/11.

Exactly. This guy made it big and did nothing to use his power to help people. Hell, if anything, he made it worse. He oversaw the cruelest company in a cruel industry.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

No one is working class as long as they can live the rest of their life in relative luxury/comfort with zero sources of income. If they choose to continue to work, it's because it's their choice to enrich themselves further, not because they will lose their home or need to start living off rice and beans.

Even retirees who live off a few thousand a month from their pensions, retirement funds, and investment returns are no longer working class in my opinion.

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 86 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Vigilante violence doesn’t lead to enduring systematic change.

Normally I agree with most of jacobin's articles but I don't agree with this. It's pretty obvious that things have already changed, even if it's just temporary. (Speaking as a non American spectator at least tbf)

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 year ago

It's strange to cite what may be "just temporary" changes when you're quoting "enduring systematic change"

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah that's fair, I did actually notice what I wrote kind of argued against itself 😅. My counterpoint would be that it's clear there's more work to be done to make it not temporary

[-] ramsorge@discuss.online 24 points 1 year ago

We could just depose them all and find out. I mean, that’s what they do to us.

[-] CM400@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago
[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 year ago

This is a historically illiterate reply. The French Revolution was enacted by organized political resistance, not random assassinations. As the author points out, such acts never achieve any substantial or lasting change.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

The only recent-ish example I can think of that actually applies is Gavrilo Princip, and the consequences were mostly accidental.

[-] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

And also wildly catastrophic

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

Well I meant lasting positive change. This means building better systems—there’s just no other way to do it. Some assassinations have clearly altered the course of history but they didn’t really improve society.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I keep telling people here that you usually cannot cure a systemic issue with violence but they refuse to believe it.

Please cite all the systemic issues solved with peace

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] CM400@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Organized vigilante violence, then.

[-] its_prolly_fine@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Has he heard of the French revolution? That was a bit of lasting change

[-] ramsorge@discuss.online 3 points 1 year ago

looks at current French government

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Looks at Napoleon being crowned absolute monarch 15 years after the king was executed.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Vigilante violence can be distinguished from revolutionary violence because it is carried out without a Party. It's just random people on their own deciding to do violence i.e. adventurism. It can't bring enduring change.

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

No, but it can inspire a populace to rise up and challenge their oppressors.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It can also lull a population into complacency rather than getting organized, and it can provoke the government into counter-revolution before the masses have reached a revolutionary stage. Adventurism can strangle any potential revolution in the crib.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

So do the ends justify the means?

[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 year ago
[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago

That's an answer to the underlying questions. You think the means can justify the ends, but you aren't sure because you don't know the ends yet.

[-] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago
[-] allo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did you actually read that link?

The extent to which suffragette militancy contributed to the eventual enfranchisement of women in 1918 has been debated by historians, although the consensus of historical opinion is that the militant campaign was not effective.

In fact:

In May 1913 another attempt had been made to pass a bill in parliament which would introduce women's suffrage, but the bill actually did worse than previous attempts when it was voted on, something which much of the press blamed on the increasingly violent tactics of the suffragettes.[116] The impact of the WSPU's violent attacks drove many members of the general public away from supporting the cause, and some members of the WSPU itself were also alienated by the escalation of violence, which led to splits in the organisation and the formation of groups such as the East London Federation of Suffragettes in 1914.

And women didn't get suffrage in the UK until 1918.

[-] allo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Yes. And I feel the amount by which the 'terrorists' made it a public issue was more important than the quoted analysts believe. It may have been so overly strong that it scared some away. But it also showed that it was a real issue to solve NOW. No more putting it off untold decades; and that is what I would hope from militant activism today. May America get Universal Healthcare like the rest of the developed world within 5 years now. And we will know who to thank.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

May America get Universal Healthcare like the rest of the developed world within 5 years now.

You forgot who Americans elected as president last month, didn't you?

[-] forrcaho@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I know it's a long shot, but it's possible Trump could be manipulated into doing some actual good. He's at the phase of life where even he must realize he can't take his material wealth with him in death, and might want to send a final "fuck you" to all his pathetic suck-up followers when he realizes that they just want to use him.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I appreciate your optimism, but I think civilization getting wiped out by a giant meteor in the next four years is more likely.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Wolf314159@startrek.website 67 points 1 year ago

More like working class traitor.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If you wrote a story about a class traitor murdering another class traitor in class, you'd get a failing grade for how ridiculous the concept was.

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah this whole story is first grade script material.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So did Abe's assassin. Reality doesn't have to be believable.

[-] mhague@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I get it!

Random acts of violence won't work.

Random acts of violence

Random acts

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah he wasn't one.

[-] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

Doesn't matter that he came from money. He saw an imbalance of power and did something about it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

They're talking about Thompson, the guy that got shot. He is the one they are trying to paint as a working class hero because he wasn't born wealthy. It's just ignoring the reality of life in America and his part in it.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, an odd interpretation of "hero", that he found success for himself and I suppose those closest to him. Even if his success story was getting rich from some more innocuous retail success, it is hardly heroic.

Some may think it's a nice story about working hard to get ahead, but that wouldn't be heroic.

Also doesn't really need to be, a decent life (generally speaking, not making a statement about this CEO0) that shied away from heroism is hardly shameful. Just don't like folks ascribing heroism to merely being successful.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
558 points (97.4% liked)

News

37817 readers
1335 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS