this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
48 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1567 readers
397 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

All Governments Should Protect Children’s Privacy by Regulating Artificial Intelligence

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dsilverz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Brazilian here. I wasn't aware of this thing until I saw this thread (to be fair, I'm more aware of USA things than things from within the country where I live).

It's a rarely situation where I completely agree with a "Brazil bans something" headline. It's a right thing to do, IMHO (well, no photo should be used without photographed's consent whatsoever, be them children or adults, but alright, it's indeed a priority to guarantee children's safety, so... maybe we Brazilian adults could wait our turn to have our privacy respected in the future as well?)

There's a slight technicality I should point out, however: there's no way for "ANPD" ("Agência Nacional de Proteção de Dados", or National Data Protection Authority) to check whether Xwitter is complying with such policy. I mean, how could Brazil confirm that Xwitter really stopped using photos from Brazilian children? Technically, Xwitter could say "yeah, Brazil, we're complying, look, here's the checkbox forcefully turned off for every photo containing Brazilian children", while they'd be secretly using mirrored content from their CDNs located within other countries to train their xAI, outside the reaches of Brazilian eyes and jurisdiction... It'd not be surprising, coming from big tech companies who seek profit.

Perhaps if Brazil decided to do this effort alongside with other nations, it'd be way more effective. But Brazil seems to be struggling with diplomatic relationships because of its involvement with BRICS, so the seemingly lonely effort may be a consequence of an isolated diplomacy landscape.

In summary, IMHO, Brazil did the right thing, although through somewhat weak means.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think Brazil needs to explain themselves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

This week, Brazil’s National Data Protection Authority banned the social media platform X, formerly Twitter, from using the personal data of its child users in Brazil to train its artificial intelligence (AI)