this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
44 points (62.9% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3880 readers
669 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@[email protected] for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The Fun Police really misinterpreted this. This is not saying anything about how good or bad LD is. I was just expecting something more like what TAS was to TOS. Other than the fact that TAS episodes were half the length and that the animated nature allowed them to afford to depict more exotic things like underwater scenes and six-limbed bridge crew members, TOS/TAS were mostly the same. They had roughly the same degree of adventure, philosophy, humor, etc. On the other hand, LD targeted a different audience by focusing on qualities that had not been prioritized in any earlier series. I was just disappointed by how different LD is from TAS.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago

I think you're missing the context of ALL the adult animation shows that came before it, because Lower Decks does something special in that category. LD takes the typical adult animation sitcom and mixes in the optimism and character writing from the best Star Trek shows, and it does this quite well. (By the way, they tone down the Rick and Morty stuff after the first few episodes, so don't get discouraged if that's what's bothering you).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago

Dude, TAS was set on the flagship of the fleet, LD is set on a B grade tow truck.

They are not the same

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No one misinterpreted your original post. It was sarcastic and dismissive, so people responded with that same energy.

As to the edit, I think it’s good that the new Trek shows each have such distinct personalities. They won’t all appeal to everyone, but the overall diversity is a strength. Part of what killed Star Trek in the 2000s was that TNG, Voyager, and Enterprise had all stuck to a very consistent approach. After close to twenty years, it was inevitably feeling a bit stale.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Ah, you added context. I fail to see however how you think your title was meant to convey "I thought it would be standard Star Trek, but animated so I was disappointed because my expectation was different".

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

Someone's funny bone got eaten by Moopsy

[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 days ago

Lower Decks is peak Star Trek. The humor is almost entirely related to previous ST series.

Is OP a Klingon agent sent to ruin our fun?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Sorry you can't enjoy something if you think it's childish. Your life must be awful.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago

Careful up there on your high horse

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think you might be in a minority on your dislike of Lower Decks.

Also, violence has always been part of Star Trek and if you don't like profanity, you are posting in the wrong fucking place.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Also, Patrick Stewart is a huge fan of Beavis and Butthead (or at least used to be), so I'm guessing he doesn't have much of a problem with violence, profanity or sophomoric humour.

Edit: still is. https://nationalpost.com/entertainment/patrick-stewart-has-an-innate-gravitas-but-who-knew-he-is-such-a-huge-beavis-and-butthead-fan

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

I don't remember where I saw or heard it, but when I was younger I came across an interview with some of the other cast of TNG talking about how Patrick Stewart originally came in this very disciplined classic Shakespearean actor and how he really started loosening up after a couple of years.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's a fun fact. Now it makes more sense that he also does voice acting on American Dad, I'd have to think he's okay with all the violence/humor in Seth MacFarlane shows (American Dad, Family Guy, etc.) along with other "adult" animated works.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

now we just need him to cameo on the orville… i expect they’d do it so perfectly

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago

Hehe, cool. 😎

img

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

Goddamn it would be amazing to talk to Patrick Stewart , but instead of Shakespere or Star Trek, talk about Transmetropolitan and Mike Judge works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I guess the secondary directive of the Federation is to gatekeep having fun?

Animation isn't for children by default. Only boring, unimaginative people talk that way about animated stories.

Star Trek has always had violence.

Star Trek has often had profanity. In another alien language sure, but we all knew which Klingon words were curses.

Does sophomoric humor graduate to senior humor when it's subtle enough that you didn't catch it as a child? Humor is SUPER subjective and VERY sensitive to the current zeitgeist, so comparing humor across a franchise that has been around this long seems a little absurd. Data pushed Crusher into the ocean for a laugh, that seems pretty sophomoric to me. Bones regularly joked about Spock's racial differences, that also seems pretty crude by today's standards.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Animation isn’t for children by default.

In fact, early animation was not even thought of to appeal to a particular age group. It was just a fun thing to do with movies that you couldn't do with live action. And people who did comic strips in newspapers, never intended to be just for kids, were hired to make them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gertie_the_Dinosaur

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

The difference is really just the profanity because even cartoons made for children tend to have violence and toilet humor.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's kinda how I feel about the majority of adult cartoons outside of shows like King of The Hill that feel more down to Earth in a way and less like a full-on highschool level comedy. I personally don't like adult animation usually as a rule because of shows like family guy, robot chicken, and such. There are definitely a very small few exceptions like KoTH or Futurama, but in general those types of shows just weren't made for people like me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Have you seen Bojack? It's more animated show than cartoon.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

i love lower decks but that's in spite of and not because of the "adult humor." the jokes that make me laugh- which is most of them!- would be exactly the same if it was an all ages program on Nickelodeon like Prodigy. the good does ultimately outweigh the bad, and signifigantly so, i just think it was a missed opportunity. i was pretty young when i watched TNG and TOS with my parents and probably would've gotten a huge kick out of LD

apparently tawney newsome is gonna be writing on the starfleet academy show so that might end up being The Best of Both Worlds (Parts I and II) between all-ages trek and funny trek

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Let me lead with this: I've also grown tired of the samieness of adult animation genre. Rick & Morty was alright for a while, but that ship was basically sailed for me by the time other shows started jumping on the trend. I appreciate what R&M/Adult Swim did in opening up the field for animation to be taken more seriously in the pitch room, we'll probably have an entire generation of decent media because of that, but we've kind of hit the trough of this first wave. That said, I liked Lower Decks a lot, because it kind of got rid of the high-stakes high-adventure selling point and zoomed in on the stakes and adventures that every day, non-galaxy class Starfleet crews can get into. It's DS9 but with the adult animation vibe instead of the daytime TV soap opera vibe. I love the introduction of the Cali class ships that are just sort of your regular, everyday, multi-role ships. I love that the Cali fleet and the Cerritos are largely just focused on the normal, unglamorous stuff that has to happen in the background while the really cool people and ships do cool stuff in space.

I also liked that the permission to be goofy and work with low stakes felt like it gave Star Trek the room it needs to breathe. It's hard to do serious new Trek that meaningfully expands the canon while also respecting what came before, which, I think, is why we tend to get a higher ratio of prequels. It's just easier and safer to stay within the bounds of the canon and tell Captain Pike's story (I fucking love SNW, not dissing it). Case and point for new Trek, you've got Discovery, which I haven't really enjoyed because it very much feels like it doesn't have room to breathe and/or was written by focus groups. Maybe it gets better later, but I watched the first two episodes and found it less enjoyable than auditing lectures. LD's characters and premise felt much more interesting by comparison, and I've really enjoyed the storytelling. It's not perfect Trek, but I think it's a show that largely knew itself and focused on trying to be the best version of what it was, and that's what's going to make it hard to beat.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 hours ago

"Written by focus groups" is a really well worded way to say that without sounding like a reactionary, well done. Disco never clicked for me, LD and SNW are fucking great though.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

You wanted Lower Decks to be more boring? I like a good conference room scene as much as the next Trekkie, but they only had 22 minutes to work with!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well now I have to check it out

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

You need to check it out anyway. Everyone needs to learn about The Koala.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it's good. treat it like Futurama

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Watch the first 5 seasons on repeat, then occasionally go through the rest of the series to remember why you only watch the first five?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Also lots of underwear

load more comments
view more: next ›