this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
176 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3970 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Investigation underway after police were called to find unresponsive teenager last week at Florence Hardwoods sawmill

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

This poor child was only 16.

And this will keep happening, and to younger children due to the rollbacks.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It amazing me that this stuff is happening. For as long as I can remember, child labor has always been one of the things that ”THEY” do and it’s “just so horrible” aka “it’s my boogeyman to hate china.”

Now suddenly here it is right in front of us and the same people suddenly don’t give a shit.

I know there’s no logic to be found with many of those people, but it still just boggles my mind.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Iowa just changed it's child labor laws as well, and I think they just went into effect. It's just a matter of time now until a child dies in the factory.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I commented on a post in the Wisconsin magazine linked to this WPR article. What I said there stands grounds here as well.

This just really sucks and I wish it would change some recent policy that we seem to be seeing, not just here, but also nationwide. That child should not have been there in the first place.

Since moving up to northern Wisconsin, I've worked in two different mills. So I kind of wonder what they had him doing there. Per the article:

In Wisconsin, minors are prohibited from working in many occupations in logging and sawmills. According to the state Department of Workforce Development, children under 18 are prohibited from entering a sawmill building. They are also not allowed to work felling or bucking timber, collection or transporting logs, operating or assisting in operating power-driven machinery, handling or using explosives, working on trestles, working on portable sawmills, working in lumberyards used for storing green lumber or using a chainsaw.

Under the law, there would have been no way for a minor to work at the first facility I was at. The break room, office, and bathroom were all located in the sawmill.

The second mill had a work around. They had two separate buildings one was the sawmill proper and the other was the pallet department. The minors could work in the pallet department and stack pieces of pallets. Think the top and bottom boards as well as the nearly 2x4 dimensional lumber. They could stack those onto pallets. That, and sweep in downtime. And management was pretty stringent about those being the only things they could do.

So, what did Florence Hardwoods have this child doing? It's quite difficult to suffer from death, let alone lose a finger, from stacking boards alone. Depending on the task they had him on, they could be facing some serious legal woes.