this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
46 points (88.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36153 readers
748 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I mean, imagine a future where every computer is just a chromebook, phones are no longer phones but just a "terminal" that streams the actual OS which runs in the cloud.

I mean, with 5G, I think its possible to make it seamless. And I think corporations push for this because they would love to have your data in the cloud, both for surveillance, and to charge a subscription for storage. I think this enshittifications would eventually happen to digital storage.

"You would own nothing and you'd be happy"

So how likely will this dystopian future happen?

I'd predict a 90% chance of this happening, and almost everyone would be okay at first, until they start overcharging for cloud storage subscriptions, but by then it'd be too late, there'd be a monopoly.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

"You would own nothing and you'd be happy"

I'm fed up with that bullshit phrase. Please, stop parroting it. And, even if it became true... You'll be happy, which is more than 90% of humanity could hope for.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Almost definitely not at all. There's just too much latency, due to the speed of light. Local storage will always be faster than cloud, by a huge margin, unless you're using an incredibly slow medium.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep, SSD latency is measured in tens of microseconds. To achieve that kind of latency with a cloud service, you'd need it to be just a few kilometers away or the light propagation delay alone becomes too great.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Idea: In the future where wireless network speeds are high, the OS image just gets loaded into RAMdisk each time.
Marketing: You get the newest OS image on every boot, with all current security patches and no (3rd party) malware, as that would be wiped with each reboot. This will also allow for even higher performance than any SSD.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

It better keep a local backup so it can boot in low coverage areas. Of course that would mildly compromise the security aspect

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You can take my 100TB storage array from my cold, dead, hands.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

Can I really? I won't murder you for it, I am willing to wait.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh don't worry, they'll cite "national security concerns" and claim that you are storing stolen classified information in order to plan for "terrorist activity".

There will be a no knock warrant, they'll kick open the door, shoot anything that moves. And they will take it away from your cold, dead, hands.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or more likely, desktop OSes will be locked down and will simply not be able to use it, while bank websites and other stuff will only work with locked down OSes.

For your security of course.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

have you tried moving to Linux?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cant move to linux when in 2030 they make every BIOS/UEFI locked, just like some android manufacturers have already been locking bootloaders.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then don't buy those products. I only buy phones I can unlock and install my own version of Android on. Same with computers and iot. If I can't install my own software then I didn't own it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If megacorps have their way, you won't be able to use banking, government, social media, etc. if you aren't running their proprietary slop.

See Google's Attestation API attempt. Computers can become like smsrtphones are right now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

You can always have a burner "secure" device for official business, and a privacy-respecting device for everything else.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

I mean, imagine a future where every computer is just a chromebook, phones are no longer phones but just a “terminal” that streams the actual OS which runs in the cloud.

It will get close to happening for nearly all computing, then it will swing back the other way to local storage and compute, then after 15-20 years it will swing back toward centralized compute and storage. This has already happened 3 times.

  • Original computing was mainframes. "Dumb terminals" that had zero local storage and only the most rudimentary compute power to handing the incoming data and display it, and take keystrokes, encode them, and send them on.

  • Then "personal computers" became a thing with the advent of cheap CPUs. Dumb Terminals/mainframes were largely discarded and everyone had their own computer on their desk with their won compute and storage. Then the Netware/Banyan era began and those desktop computers were networked to have some remote shared storage. (there's a slightly different branching with Sun/HPUX/DigitalUnix and Workstation grade hardware)

  • Then Citrix WinFrame and Sun Ray stateless thin clients showed up once again swinging the compute and storage almost entirely remotely to centralized heavy powered servers with (mostly) dumb terminals, but these were graphic interfaces like MS Windows or Xwindow.

  • Once again, powerful desktop CPUs showed up with the Pentium II etc compute was back under users desks.

  • Now phones and tablets with cloud has show up, and you're asking the question.

So what I think will swing primary compute and storage back to the user side (handheld now) is again, cheap compute and storage on the device. Right now so many services are cloud based because the massive compute and storage requirements only exist in volume in the cloud. However, bandwidth is still limited. Imagine when the next (next?) generation of mobile CPUs arrive, and with a tiny bit of power you could do today's bitcoin mining on your phone or process AI datasets with ease in the palm of your hand. And why would you send the entire dataset to the cloud when you can process it locally and then send the result?

So the pendulum keeps swinging; centralized and distributed, back and forth.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

“Cloud” is just a 2010+ term for multihomed server. Before around 1995, almost all Internet-related storage was “cloud”, with people using terminals and terminal emulators connecting to the mainframe servers that hosted their storage.

And yet, even back then, people stored local data on floppy disks because sometimes you needed something when your online storage wasn’t available for one reason or another.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cloud storage will only last till they get a monopoly then when they start charging through the nose when they start the Enshittification phase . The scramble for local storage will begin but by that time they will outlaw it or some other bullshit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Theoretically you can host everything at home. You just need a connection that is fast enough.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's pretty funny how I've seen posts exactly like this one 10-15 years ago, and nothing has really changed that much from a consumer perspective.

It's just simply cheaper, more reliable, and more convenient to have local storage.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If you dug into history - with computers in the 70s-80s, we used to remotely dial into another computer. The terminal at your school (as home computers were pretty expensive) would dial into a stronger computer and you'd use up their resources.

Every few years, I see that mentality coming back. Cloud computing. Chromebooks. Remote desktops. Stadia and gaming on-demand.

Its fascinating.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

People also know what cloud gaming means now.

If that device loses service, it's just a fancy paper weight until some nerd on GitHub spends a month rooting it and writing homebrew.

But people are also fucking stupid, so... They'll buy anything, just sell it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wait, we had networking like that in the 70s? I've never heard that, do you have any other specific information I can look up? A computer at a school talking to another school remotely to use its processing power in the 70s sounds like alternate reality. That's literally just the internet. What were they pushing the data over? Surely not phone lines?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time-sharing

Terminals sent keystrokes to the mainframe, and the mainframe sent text back to the terminal. They used modems and serial connections

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Cooooollllllll! It's like computer morse code

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yup, it's why ASCII has weird characters like "carriage return" and "bell"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Etymology of ascii characters is something I never even considered. New hobby unlocked

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah the mass of goo will probably embrace it for the convenience, and the resistant few will be demonized as likely terrorists and go underground. I can see a Republican US Congress passing an Online Freedom Act that bans private storage over the amount needed to run Windows or MacOS and blaming viruses on Linux and Mexicans.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Local storage will always be needed in business environments, either for security reasons (sensitive files that can't go online), or technical (speed requirements or offline access).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good point, I didn't even consider business.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

It's why SD cards are still relevant. A professional photographer takes thousands of photos during a wedding and needs to process them in a computer. Cloud is not feasible or economical.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

I would say it is unlikely - storage is so cheap that some form of local storage is likely to stay.

A terminal device still needs some form of storage to run the software to access the cloud. That might end up being some small storage on a chip but the difference is not between none and something, but some and more.

I also think there are enough people who want storage they own and control that it'll persist as a concept. Also having devices that work when networks are down is a benefit in itself - attempts to make devices dumb terminals get exposed as a productivity nightmare when networks do go out.

I think big business will certainly try hard to lock people in to their ecosystems. Remote storage, remote computing/graphics processing are all ways they will try. But conversely there are vibrant communities pushing independent & private alternatives that I don't see dying - whether thats Linux on PCs, or Graphene OS to take control of your android device etc.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Likely, never due to the three storage backup rule: save on local device, save on external, and save one copy on cloud. So you don't lose your work or media.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s already happening. Microsoft’s push to onedrive and m365 was to get everyone off of legacy apps.

Next will be ARM devices that have a multi-day battery because it’s all just cached apps accessing your cloud-saved data.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

AFAIAC, all that that achieved was to push me off of those MS products.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't see that as likely until 10gbps connections are the norm

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Network latency is like seek time on a HDD.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Unlikely, as cloud storage providers can't be trusted completely. They be like "but it's encrypted. trust me bro", but every time they get the chance, like when a weakness is detected in the cipher, they will peek or let some government peek. This is how magically your competitor ends up with your business secrets.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Like others I don't see it happening but I could see a fast persistant storage merging ram and disk into one feature.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I still consider a microSD card a must for my portable devices so I can hoard media locally.

But I pay for a cloud backup of anything I produce.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

"You would own nothing and you'd be happy"

This is a misinterpreted quote that led to a bunch of bullshit conspiracy theories by people who have not actually listened to the whole thing, such as what you're spewing here btw. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Reset#Conspiracy_theories

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

For me, never.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

There has been a ping pong between emphasis on the server or emphasis on the client since the beginning.

In the near future, there will likely be a trend to private / self-hosted clouds (instead of vendor clouds) for enterprise and enthusiasts that want data access in multiple locations. But at some point, all data could be local but synced to all your devices. That may be the ultimate client/server balance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I think we’re already there but not in the way OP describes. People haven’t had great experiences with Chrimebooks and storage is cheap

Think of your Google drive, OneDrive or Apple drive. The most common scenario is you use local storage for reliability and responsiveness, but it’s always aynching to the cloud. Many of your files may not even exist in local storage but it looks like it does

Or consider Apples approach to photo storage. You can choose to use iCloud for photo storage and it keeps only a thumbnail on local storage. Your basic browse and search operations are reliable and responsive, and but you download the full photo as you need it

load more comments
view more: next ›