this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
246 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39376 readers
2077 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Iran is experiencing widespread power outages, with cryptocurrency mining suspected as a contributing factor.

Bitcoin mining, which requires massive electricity, has surged in Iran due to subsidized energy and rising bitcoin prices, recently hitting $100,000.

Officials blame unauthorized miners using free or subsidized electricity, while public frustration grows over blackouts.

Iran’s energy crisis is compounded by sanctions, aging infrastructure, low fuel reserves, and climate change.

Authorities struggle to balance energy needs amid allegations of mining by paramilitary groups and fears of economic dependence on volatile cryptocurrencies.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well at least Bitcoin is very decentralized and not subject to powerful wealthy groups that control...oh whoops.

Well at least it is anonymous and protects its users from spying and cyber crime...oh whoops.

Well at least almost all the power used to mine it is renewable so the environmental impact isn't...oh whoops.

Well at least there are a ton of businesses and organizations that accept and use Bitcoin...oh whoops.

Well at least the crypto community is famously rational, friendly, and very generous...oh whoops.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Every time I raise the issue with Proof-of-Work coins being damaging to the environment I get a flood of hate. Proof-of-Stake coins might have other problems, but at least they consume 100s of times less power. I'm sure we could even come up with something better if the crypto bros stopped circlejerking.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Crypto bros depend on more people speculating with their currency of choice to increase the market value. If they're pissed, that's a good sign.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I don't have fomo about crypto or speculative stock trading. I'm sure it'll cause me problems in the end, but I've opted not to procreate, so the end doesn't have to be prolonged.

What a mess. Hopefully, the entitled generationally wealthy folk are the last ones left standing without anyone else to blame. At which point they can engage in fisticuffs like the barbarians once did.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But Bitcoin only use excess energy that otherwise wouldn’t be used! /s

(Yes, this is a real argument they make)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

WTF, that logic.

It's especially painful because some (most?) other cryptocurrencies don't need energy-hungry mining. Bitcoin was just first. It's like everyone's still buying the Apple I.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

a basic economics class will say essentially that, just in more words and with the asterisks' of energy that costs less than what can be earned from mining with it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, they're pretty clear that supply elasticity (of widgets, if it's just basic) exists too.

In the near future "more electricity than we can use" might actually become a problem on sunny days, but I don't think a lot of Bitcoins are currently produced that way. And even then, there's lots of things you can do with free electricity, and most are cheaper to set up than a mining rig.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

hah, funny.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Officials blame"

Probably someone is mining Bitcoin illegally somewhere, but I have a feeling the guys in charge are blaming anyone but themselves. And of course they're also mining crypto..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It's not bitcoin's fault. They're just saying that Bitcoin is worth less than the other things they would rather send their electricity to. Some raindrops are wetter than others.