top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 214 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

When you run OpenSUSE, you can feel it was made by Germans.
The installer is a beautiful example of German engineering.
The package manager is a perfect example of German over-engineering.
If you run it with KDE, you have 2 redundant GUI admin tools for every config in the system, and 4 for setting up printers.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 92 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yeah that sounds like a typical BMW engine layout.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 172 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Sees "Germany"

    Die Kommentarspalte dieser Pfostierung befindet sich ab sofort im Besitz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland meine Kameraden!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ahoi, Genosse! Wie lΓ€uft die Germanisierung? Verbreiten Sie erfolgreich das Wort von Linux in Ihrem Heimatland?

    (Übersetzung von DeepL)

    Anti Commercial-AI license

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ich bevorzuge:

    π•―π–Žπ–Šπ–˜π–Š π•Άπ–”π–’π–’π–Šπ–“π–™π–†π–—π–˜π–Šπ–π–™π–Žπ–”π–“ π–Žπ–˜π–™ π–“π–šπ–“ π•°π–Žπ–Œπ–Šπ–“π–™π–šπ–’ π–‰π–Šπ–— π•­π–šπ–“π–‰π–Šπ–˜π–—π–Šπ–•π–šπ–‡π–‘π–Žπ– π•―π–Šπ–šπ–™π–˜π–ˆπ–π–‘π–†π–“π–‰

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 71 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Terminal, Terminal, Terminal, German Terminal

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 149 points 2 years ago (17 children)

    Console, Console, Console, Konsole

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • load more comments (16 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 70 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Nixos: everything everywhere all at once

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I'm still a Linux noob all things considered, and I've been using NixOS for six months or more.

    It is HARD, but I see the true value of it. I will never need to reinstall Linux because I broke it, that's simply impossible.

    If I ever need to migrate my system, it's all backed up to github. With a single

    Bash update.sh
    

    every single .config file backed up, system upgraded, all packages updated.

    I just love Nix, it's the perfect OS for me.

    Now I just need to learn how to use flakes...

    Sidebar: I've never asked before, but maybe someone can help me out. If I install a flake of an application, am I supposed to add it to the existing flake, or can I modulate flakes?

    I've noticed when installing the nixvim flake it generates a new flake and it runs when I issue the

    nix run ~/.dotfiles/nixvim/flake.nix
    

    command, but I don't want to have to run that command every time. I feel like making a fish abbreviation isn't the correct way of doing this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 54 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    ITT - "I DISAGREE WITH THE FACTUAL ACCURACY OF THE SETUP AND/OR PUNCHLINE OF YOUR JOKE."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    I think I've put fedora on at least 4 personal systems and it has never caused an issue. It's so smooth it's boring in the best way. Switched to it for daily computing about 4 years ago. I use a minipc as a media server with Arch and turning it on it's exciting. Just this fucking morning the default configuration decided that my main audio device was a microphone. Lovely. So flexible.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 35 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    I mean, I'm on Debian and I'm on the same install instance I've had for almost four years now. I'm constantly reading about how some of you people keep hosing your other distros with a normal update...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Real. Though sometimes running a recent version of something is a real challenge, unless it ships in appimage. If it’s a small program you can usually backport the package from unstable or just build it yourself, but if it depends on some rust or js libraries or whathaveyou you have to do so much crap you might as well just be running trixie

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 30 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    I'll never stop hating that debian is labeled stable. I'm fully aware that they are using the definition of stable that simply means not updating constantly but the problem is that people conflate that with stability as in unbreaking. Except it's the exact opposite in my experience, I've had apt absolutely obliterate debian systems way too often. Vs pacman on arxh seems to be exceptionally good at avoiding that. Sure the updated package itself could potentially have a bug or cause a problem but I can't think of any instance where the actual process of updating itself is what eviscerated the system like with apt and dpkg.

    And even in the event of an update going catastrophically wrong to the point that the system is inoperable I can simply chroot in use a statically built binary pacman and in a oneliner command reinstall ALL native packages in one go which I've never had not fix a borked system from interrupted update or needing a rollback

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    You are maybe conflating stability with convenience.

    "Why is this stable version of my OS unstable when I update and or install new packages...."

    The entire OS falling down randomly on every distribution during normal OS background operations was always an issue or worry, and old Debbie Stables was meant to help make linux feel reliable for production server use, and it has done a decent job at it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 26 points 2 years ago

    The four fundamental Ys

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Fedora 41 is now the 'wait 45 seconds every boot because you don't have a tpm chip' version.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 19 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    Flexibility translates to unpredictable.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    I’ve never had any issues with my Arch install being unpredictable. It has always worked exactly as I expected it to, even though I update it every couple of days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    I've been using Arch since 2014. If I could be arsed, I could write you a looooooooong list of regressions I've had to deal with over the years. For an experienced Linux user, they're usually fairly easy to deal with, but saying you never have to deal with anything is just a lie.

    My experience with Arch is basically: it's all very predictable until it isn't and you suddenly find yourself troubleshooting something random like unexplainable bluetooth disconnects caused by a firmware or kernel update.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (12 replies)

    Somehow, I feel called out.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    OpenSUSE is the "all of the above" of Linux distros

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    Fedora is security? I mean, don't get me wrong, I love it, it's my daily driver after trying just about every distro under the sun, but I would've figured something like Qubes would stand head and shoulders above it.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    Qubes is the actuall security distro tho.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Don't forget SUSE's focus on SAP... Which is also Germany I guess

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    I would hope the Fedora isn't the only one that cares about security

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    From my experience of Fedora: would you like to update today? Debian: You're good bro, no updates today.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Danke fΓΌr dies handbuch

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I don't get the Germany part, and I'm German

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί