this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
84 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
282 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

NYT gift article expires in 30 days.

https://ghostarchive.org/archive/tvEBg

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh this is actual medicine.

I fully expected some fluff piece about using cancer metaphorically, but this is a pretty interesting piece about how the word cancer colors a patient's perception of risk and treatment approaches.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sounds obvious when you read about it.

But changing the name of things is difficult…

At least here there’s a very good argument.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, this got a good writeup by news piece. I first learned about this from Medlife Crisis's The Epidemic of Fake Disease. Statistics about anything as big as cancer diagnoses are beyond complex, and honestly it would take a gargantuan effort of science communication to get this out to the general public. It's... sobering to know that mortality is not morbidity and that harsh side effects create the most important optimization problems of patients' lives. I hope that if (or maybe when) I get confronted with a similar diagnosis, I can face the numbers and the odds with as much of a level head as possible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The important thing is NOT to read the numbers and odds when/if it happens to you. Treatments are progressing rapidly, and odds are based on people receiving treatment 5+ years previously.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

what about call centers?

EDIT: I read the headline with 'center' instead of 'cancer' so to me it made sense back then :,(

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Call centers are definitely cancers

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Lot of metaphorical cancer out there, but the article was about real, but arguably mislabeled stages of what could develop into cancer.

Highly worth reading.