I enjoy how this article basically enumerates every name removed from their sites.

If you're worried that your CEO will be murdered, that might be an indicator that you have some deep problems as a company. If you're all worried, that may be an indicator that your entire industry is a problem.

What do you call one dead CEO? a good start.

Oh boy sounds like they're afraid of copycat killers.

Why - are they doing something that should make them afraid?

They shouldn’t let this become common. Hiding who Runs the company just makes them even MORE faceless and disconnected from humanity. Maybe focus on not shafting literally the entire population for money and shit coverage.

Yeah, if I lived off blood money in a country with insanely high gun ownership, I would also start acting like it.

archive.org and linked in.

Let's hope they live in fear. Let's hope they are never comfortable, even in their mansions and yachts.

Good thing there isn't some kind of machine that lets you go way back in time to see the pages before they were removed

Hiding your website link isn't going to stop someone your lack of humanity has pushed to the point of actually shooting you.

And removing the tiniest bit of visible accountability you give doesn't seem like a particularly good idea either.

Quick! To LinkedIn!

Aren't public companies public?

Yeah because somebody as motivated as the shooter in Manhattan will totally be deterred by removing the "Our Team" pages from your website.

Talk about focusing on the wrong thing. How about instead of worrying about how to hide the names of your executives you instead have a meeting where you decide to be an ethical company that balances the needs of the shareholder with the needs of your customers.

Novel idea, I know.

Deny, Defend, Depose

Instead of "kill your local pedophile" a lot more rewarding slogan could be "kill you local CEO".

Pedophiles and ceos are in the same category for me.

Cause they know what they are doing is wrong!

"there gooees my hero! Watch him as he goes!"

I initially was thinking that people were just aggressive about him, because of the insurance companies and not necessarily what he did, especially since he was CEO for 3 years, but looks like UH had rejections in single digit and after he took over they jumped to over 20%

I understand the outrage though. While some rejections could be people asking for things that are not necessary, for example Ozempic if one doesn't have diabetes, many of those affect quality of life for millions of people and even affect of they can live or die.

It is absolutely horrible and unethical to make money on misfortune of others.

Good! The ONLY way to Protect Themselves is to Hide and definitely NOT to create Policies that HELP the Working Class!

Guilty all of them. They know and now they fear it. It wont change the shit they do in any decent way. Those narcs are already forming a new world view to make them martyrs.

Cowards.

I don't get the fuss about it. Guy went voting ... he had no paper vote against what fucked him, his loved ones, and millions of fellow Americans over, so he used a high velocity lead vote. Still, just democracy at work.

Guaranteed they were not talking about ending their war on humanity

All the more reason that internet archives are important.